2021
DOI: 10.1117/1.nph.8.4.045002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of effect of modulation frequency on high-density diffuse optical tomography image quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an upward tail to the reconstruction of the contrast anomaly which extends to the surface of the phantom from the CW case, which is not observed for the FD or mFD case. As is previously established, phase data samples deeper than intensity data [ 14 , 26 ] , which are evident in the FD and mFD reconstruction of absorption coefficient. However, the FD and mFD reconstructions suffer from some positive and negative contrast artifacts, which are seen above the contrast anomaly instead of the positive tail in the CW case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There is an upward tail to the reconstruction of the contrast anomaly which extends to the surface of the phantom from the CW case, which is not observed for the FD or mFD case. As is previously established, phase data samples deeper than intensity data [ 14 , 26 ] , which are evident in the FD and mFD reconstruction of absorption coefficient. However, the FD and mFD reconstructions suffer from some positive and negative contrast artifacts, which are seen above the contrast anomaly instead of the positive tail in the CW case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The reason why intensity data at multiple modulation frequencies was not in the mFD data type was that it has been shown that there is an appreciable increase in the sampling depth of phase data for increasing modulation frequencies, but that the change in sampling depth with intensity data is very small [ 26 ], so it was decided that only additional phases would be used in the mFD data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although alternative fNIRS acquisition techniques, such as TD fNIRS and FD (frequency domain) fNIRS, 23 offer many theoretical advantages over the more traditionally used CW fNIRS (including enhanced sensitivity to deeper tissue 24 , 25 ), several practical aspects have hindered their adoption. In particular, TD and FD fNIRS require much more complicated and precise (and thus, potentially more expensive) instrumentation, as well as more sophisticated processing techniques to reach their full potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%