2007
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/93/1/012047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of EPR signals on tooth enamel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a low mass WD is unlikely given that evidence from the nova ejecta (Lance, McCall, and Uomoto 1988) indicate a high mass WD. Photometry over the intervening years indicated that the WD was undergoing fast and nonlinear synchronization from measurements by Katz (1991) with a rate of P = 1.8 × 10 −6 for 1977-1979, 2.7 × 10 −8 for 1979-1987, and 2.4 × 10 −8 for 2000-2003(Pavlenko and Shugarov 2005a. Schmidt, et al (1995) obtained P = 3.86 × 10 −8 for 1987-1992 from polarimetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a low mass WD is unlikely given that evidence from the nova ejecta (Lance, McCall, and Uomoto 1988) indicate a high mass WD. Photometry over the intervening years indicated that the WD was undergoing fast and nonlinear synchronization from measurements by Katz (1991) with a rate of P = 1.8 × 10 −6 for 1977-1979, 2.7 × 10 −8 for 1979-1987, and 2.4 × 10 −8 for 2000-2003(Pavlenko and Shugarov 2005a. Schmidt, et al (1995) obtained P = 3.86 × 10 −8 for 1987-1992 from polarimetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The beat period has systematically increased with time. Using the spin-orbit beat period relation, orbital and beat periods were used for calculation of the current value of the WD spin period (Pavlenko and Shugarov 2005a) rather than direct measurements of the WD spin period which is possible only while the accretion flow is stable, between pole switchings, and is best done with polarimetric or X-ray observations. Spin-orbit synchronization times of a hundreds to a few thousand years are expected from theory, see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its 0.060-d superhump period (Pavlenko et al 2007;Kato et al 2011) and 0.059005-d orbital period (Pavlenko 2009;Zharikov et al 2008;Kato et al 2009) suggested SDSS J0804 as a period bouncer, passed the period minimum (Zharikov et al 2008). Pavlenko et al (2007) first discovered the nonradial pulsations of the WD that appeared 8 months after the 2006 outburst and lasted for ∼ 2 years. Now there are thirteen accreting pulsating WDs belonging to the SU UMa stars (Mukadam et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDSS J080434.20+510349.2 (hereafter SDSS J0804) was first discovered as a CV and was considered as a potential dwarf nova with an underlying white dwarf (WD) in quiescence prior to the 2006 outburst (Szkody et al 2006) and it was first found in outburst by (Pavlenko et al 2007). Its 0.060-d superhump period (Pavlenko et al 2007;Kato et al 2011) and 0.059005-d orbital period (Pavlenko 2009;Zharikov et al 2008;Kato et al 2009) suggested SDSS J0804 as a period bouncer, passed the period minimum (Zharikov et al 2008). Pavlenko et al (2007) first discovered the nonradial pulsations of the WD that appeared 8 months after the 2006 outburst and lasted for ∼ 2 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signal is predominantly derived from stable CO 2 -radical (IAEA, 2002). Two methods have been used to assess the absorbed dose of irradiated enamel by EPR: additive re-irradiation and the use of calibration curve, in the additive re-irradiation method: the sample is incrementally irradiated to construct a response curve specific to the sample in question (Pavlenko, A et al, 2007) as shown in Figure (8). The other method uses a universal calibration curve (EPR signal Intensity versus absorbed dose) generated using a large blended sample pool of enamel material designed to average the sample-to-sample variances.…”
Section: Retrospective and Emergency Dosimetry 541 Teeth Enamel Dosmentioning
confidence: 99%