2017
DOI: 10.15345/iojes.2017.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Factors Affected to Mathematics Engagement of Middle School Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This concept was reinforced by Ouweneel et al (2011) and Chang (2015) who described the correlation between self-efficacy and engagement as positive. Aside from these, there were also other investigations that concluded the same (Guneri and Guvenc, 2013;Birgin et al, 2017;Grant, 2017;Wang et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This concept was reinforced by Ouweneel et al (2011) and Chang (2015) who described the correlation between self-efficacy and engagement as positive. Aside from these, there were also other investigations that concluded the same (Guneri and Guvenc, 2013;Birgin et al, 2017;Grant, 2017;Wang et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Stovall (2003) defines student engagement as the time students spend on tasks and as their desire to take part in activities. Gunuc and Kuzu (2014) refer to student engagement as “the quality and quantity of students’ psychological, cognitive, emotional and behavioral reactions to the learning process as well as to in-class/out-of-class academic and social activities to achieve successful learning outcomes (p.588).” In this respect, student engagement is thought to include the whole of the efforts and time that students spend to achieve the intended outcomes (Birgin, Mazman-Akar, Uzun, Goksu, & Seval, 2017; Carini, Kuh, & Klein, 2006; Ergün & Kurnaz, 2017; Junco, 2012; Junco, Heiberger, & Loken, 2011; Krause & Coates, 2008; Kuh, 2009). Krause and Coates (2008) associate student engagement with the high quality of outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Çelik, Örenoğlu Toraman and Çelik (2018) investigated the level of relationship between student engagement and sensed teacher immediacy and reported a positive relationship between teacher immediacy and affective and cognitive engagement. Birgin, Akar, Uzun, Göksu, Peker and Gümüş (2017) found that secondary school students with higher affection for their Mathematics teachers had higher engagement levels compared to other students. Menteş (2011) identified a positive and significant relationship between students' trust for their teachers and engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%