“…In 2014, a new family of oxide ion conductors based on the ferroelectric perovskite sodium bismuth titanate (Na 0.5 Bi 0.5 TiO 3 , NBT) was reported [1]. Since then, numerous efforts have been devoted to enhancing the bulk conductivity (σ b ) of NBT by introducing A-site cation nonstoichiometry and/or acceptor doping [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], based on which the following cognitions have been established: (1) high oxideion conductivity can be obtained in Na-rich or Bi-deficient NBT, e.g., Na 0.51 Bi 0.5 TiO 3.005 (N 0.51 BT) or Na 0.5 Bi 0.49 TiO 2.985 (NB 0.49 T) [2]; (2) acceptor doping, either on A-site (e.g., partial replacement of Bi 3+ by Sr 2+ [3]) or B-site (e.g., partial substitution of Ti 4+ by Mg 2+ [1]), generates oxygen vacancies by an ionic compensation mechanism, and therefore is an effective approach for enhancing the σ b of NBT [8]; (3) σ b of acceptor-doped NB 0.49 T is higher than that of yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) at < 600 • C, and it shows no appreciable degradation at 500 • C contrary to the rapid conductivity decay for rare-earth-stabilized δ -Bi 2 O 3 [6], which makes NBT-based oxide ion conductors promising candidate electrolyte materials for IT-SOFCs.…”