1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02559738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of GAGS on 24-hour and 2-hour urines from calcium oxalate stone formers and healthy subjects

Abstract: The role of urinary glycosaminoglycans (GAGS) in calcium oxalate lithiasis is of great interest in urologic research. It has been claimed that GAGS are important inhibitors of calcium oxalate crystal growth and aggregation. The aim of this paper is to evaluate GAGS excretion and concentration in two groups of patients, calcium stone formers (with or without metabolic alteration) and a control group, to detect possible differences. The findings of this study show that significant differences exist not only in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) show that 24-hour urinray GAG excretion and concentration were lower for calcium oxalate stone formers, men and women, than for healthy people. Although these findings are similar to those de scribed in a previous paper [16] employing the method of Blumenkrantz and Asboe-Hansen 117] to determine GAG levels, the urinary mean values were clearly lower using the DMB technique. These differences could be attributed to two facts: (1) The GAG precipitation procedure proposed by Blumenkrantz and Asboe-Hansen [17] could carry pro ducts containing uronic acid, generating positive errors when reacting with o-hydroxydiphenyl.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…1) show that 24-hour urinray GAG excretion and concentration were lower for calcium oxalate stone formers, men and women, than for healthy people. Although these findings are similar to those de scribed in a previous paper [16] employing the method of Blumenkrantz and Asboe-Hansen 117] to determine GAG levels, the urinary mean values were clearly lower using the DMB technique. These differences could be attributed to two facts: (1) The GAG precipitation procedure proposed by Blumenkrantz and Asboe-Hansen [17] could carry pro ducts containing uronic acid, generating positive errors when reacting with o-hydroxydiphenyl.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Such studies show that in non-stone formers total GAGs excretion varies between 0 and 50 µmoles glucuronic acid/ 24hr. Some studies show a decreased excretion of GAGs in stone formers (95)(96)(97)(98)(99)(100)(101)(102)(103)(104)(105), however; at least an equal number of studies find comparable GAGs excretion by stone formers and non-stone formers (79, 106-115). The differences in results may relate to differences in employed techniques, patient selection, epithelial damage or the contribution of bladder excretions to the total GAG pool (93).…”
Section: High Mw Compounds 521 Glycosaminoglycans (Gags)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only is heparin does not appear in human urine. Many investigators [5,14,17,25,33,61,64,65] have studied urinary GAGs, but it remains unclear whether there are qualitative and/or quantitative differences in urinary GAGs between urolithiasis patients and normal individuals. Moreover, we lack detailed knowledge about the role of GAGs in cell membrane function and its influence on cell surface properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%