2016
DOI: 10.2514/1.j055125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Gas Seeding for Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence in Hypersonic Boundary Layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shock wave angle predicted by the full energy formulation is β s ∼ 7 • , while the angle predicted by the reduced energy formulation is β s ∼ 6.3 • . The angle prediction of the full energy formulation is very close to the one predicted by OpenFOAM [71], which is β a ∼ 7.2 • , while the reduced energy formulation underpredicts this value. The smaller shock wave angle predicted by the reduced energy formulation is the reason behind the higher Mach number predicted in the post-shock region.…”
Section: D Mach 10 Oblique Shock Problemsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The shock wave angle predicted by the full energy formulation is β s ∼ 7 • , while the angle predicted by the reduced energy formulation is β s ∼ 6.3 • . The angle prediction of the full energy formulation is very close to the one predicted by OpenFOAM [71], which is β a ∼ 7.2 • , while the reduced energy formulation underpredicts this value. The smaller shock wave angle predicted by the reduced energy formulation is the reason behind the higher Mach number predicted in the post-shock region.…”
Section: D Mach 10 Oblique Shock Problemsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Next, the results of a 2D Mach 6 flat plate [70] problem with detailed mesh convergence study, are presented. A Mach 10 NASA wedge test case [71] is shown, followed by the Mach 17 flow over a cylinder problem [72] to investigate the instabilities, namely "Carbuncle problem" [73], encountered when traditional CAU DC operator, DC 1 , is used. An alternative definition of DC operator, DC 2 , that alleviates this problem, is proposed.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The flow is modeled using an explicit, second-order Roe-FDS method where the gradient is estimated using Green-Gauss Node-based technique (ANSYS, 2013). The ANSYS Fluent has two solver schemes, AUSM and Roe-FDS; however, the Roe-FDS scheme is chosen to compute the flux vectors without an oscillatory solution at the flow discontinuities according to Arisman et al (2015).…”
Section: D Axisymmetric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%