2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.07.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of gender difference in human response to temperature step changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
2
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
17
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hausman test (reported in the lower panel of onine Appendix Table A.2) confirms that the coefficient values are significantly different at the 5 percent level ( p-value 0.0325). This is consistent with prior research that temperature-sensitivity is particularly pronounced amongst females (Yu et al 2010, Xiong et al 2015. The result also goes some way to address a concern that the patterns that we observe are driven not by the effect of temperature on judgement, but that temperature is instead influencing outcomes by impacting (for example) the comportment of the applicant or his lawyer.…”
Section: A Linearsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Hausman test (reported in the lower panel of onine Appendix Table A.2) confirms that the coefficient values are significantly different at the 5 percent level ( p-value 0.0325). This is consistent with prior research that temperature-sensitivity is particularly pronounced amongst females (Yu et al 2010, Xiong et al 2015. The result also goes some way to address a concern that the patterns that we observe are driven not by the effect of temperature on judgement, but that temperature is instead influencing outcomes by impacting (for example) the comportment of the applicant or his lawyer.…”
Section: A Linearsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To put this into perspective, in our sample, the difference in grant rate between a judge at the twenty-fifth percentile in terms of leniency, and one at the seventy-fifth percentile, is 7.9 percent. Consistent with some existing studies of temperature susceptibility varying by gender (Yu et al 2010;Xiong et al 2015) the effect is particularly pronounced for female judges. To allay concerns that there might be something unique to the immigration setting that is driving the results, we repeat the exercise for decisions made in 18,461 Parole Suitability Hearings at the 39 locations of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), arriving at parallel conclusions.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Innate differences in physical traits and physiology between men and women is likely to create differences in their thermoregulatory functions. Although few studies have analysed gender difference in bodily reactions to temperature step-changes [31], similar investigation regarding thermal comfort is required.…”
Section: Gender Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We cannot ignore the impact of indoor temperature exposure on older adults. Besides, men and women have different ability in thermoregulation [21], and one study demonstrated gender-related differences in sweat loss [22]. A study indicated that older adults spend significantly more time indoors compared with adolescents (age: 12-19) and adults (age: 20-59) [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%