2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of hemodynamics in the development of dissecting aneurysm within patient-specific dissecting aneurismal aortas using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
167
3
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
10
167
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The circumferential component of such stress might be the cleavage force to separate the layers of the aortic wall, and therefore accounts for the distal progression to the visceral segment of the aorta. Similar results have been demonstrated in the study by Tse et al [10]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The circumferential component of such stress might be the cleavage force to separate the layers of the aortic wall, and therefore accounts for the distal progression to the visceral segment of the aorta. Similar results have been demonstrated in the study by Tse et al [10]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Altered fluid dynamics were shown to influence the development of dissection, whereas high WSSs were associated with tear initiation and propagation [58].…”
Section: Fluid Mechanics Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the computational mesh used in all these reports does not have a refined boundary layer and uses very low numbers of tetrahedral elements throughout the computational domain (~264,000-388,000 elements). Likewise, the work of Tse et al 89 who investigated a pre and post-aneurysmal dissection case also employ a coarse mesh (84,209 and 114,148 elements) without a refined boundary layer. Refinement of the mesh in the boundary layer is critical and was shown to change the resulting velocity, pressure and WSS by 9, 30 and 24%, respectively.…”
Section: Variations In Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%