Retention index prediction based on the molecule structure is not often used in practice due to low accuracy, the need to use paid software to calculate molecular descriptors (MD), and the narrow applicability domain of many models. In recent years, relatively accurate and versatile deep learning (DL)‐based models have emerged. These models are now used in practice as an additional criterion in gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry identification. The DB‐225ms stationary phase (usually described as 50%‐cyanopropylphenyl‐50%‐dimethylpolysiloxane in available sources) is widely used, but ready‐to‐use retention index estimation models are not available for it. This study presents such models. The models are linear and use simple constitutional MD and retention indices predicted by DL for the DB‐WAX and DB‐624 stationary phases as MD (we show that it is their use that allows us to achieve satisfactory accuracy). The accuracy obtained for a completely unseen hold‐out test set: root mean square error 73.2; mean absolute error 45.7; median absolute error 22.0. The models were trained using a retention data set of 266 volatile compounds. All calculations can be performed using the convenient open‐source software CHERESHNYA. The final equations are implemented as a spreadsheet and a code snippet and are available online: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26800789.