Fluids 2000 Conference and Exhibit 2000
DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-2601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of hypersonic turbulent flow over the X-38 Crew Return Vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak heating rate at the reattachment point is overestimated by all models as is seen in Table 1. G-F-inp and Chien-inp show an enormous excess in heat transfer, a behavior that has also been shown by Weber et al [13] for various K-ε models. G-F-cmp and Chien-cmp show a lower excess in heat transfer compared with G-F-inp and Chien-inp, and the present model shows a smallest excess in heat transfer, as demonstrated in Table 1.…”
Section: -Degree Compression Ramp Test Casesupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The peak heating rate at the reattachment point is overestimated by all models as is seen in Table 1. G-F-inp and Chien-inp show an enormous excess in heat transfer, a behavior that has also been shown by Weber et al [13] for various K-ε models. G-F-cmp and Chien-cmp show a lower excess in heat transfer compared with G-F-inp and Chien-inp, and the present model shows a smallest excess in heat transfer, as demonstrated in Table 1.…”
Section: -Degree Compression Ramp Test Casesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Velocity profiles in wall units are shown in Figure 1c. The logarithmic law of the wall u + =1/кln(y + )+C is also shown with к=0.35 and C=5.0 [13]. All models yield a von Karman constant that is slightly smaller than that from the one suggested by So et al [14].…”
Section: Flat Plate Test Casementioning
confidence: 59%
“…The models were investigated in super-and hypersonic flat plate boundary layers, on a compression ramp at M ∞ = 9.22 and on a hypersonic flow over the X-38 vehicle at M ∞ = 6, where windtunnel data are available from NASA Langley Research Center. The complete issue of the numerical simulations using ASTRIUM's DAVIS-VOL code are reported in [19]. Here a selection of these results will be given.…”
Section: Advanced Turbulence Modellingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(The two-layer method was not used to predict flap heating.) Experimentally, the boundary layer was forced turbulent via discrete roughness and the resulting heating distribution compared to turbulent prediction 53,58,59 (Fig. 26b).…”
Section: Windward Flap Heatingmentioning
confidence: 99%