2012
DOI: 10.1002/pssc.201200249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of local field effect of α‐NaYF4:Nd3+ nanocrystals

Abstract: Pure α‐NaYF4: Nd3+ nanocrystals of various sizes from 6 nm to 18 nm were successfully synthesized by a solvothermal method. The monodispersed oleate‐capped nanocrystals were dispersed in several nonpolar solvents to obtain stable colloidal. Under the excitation by an 803 nm laser, luminescent decay curves of the colloidal were measured. The relationship between emission lifetimes of samples and effective refractive indices of solvents was studied for the local field correction factor. In the 18 nm sample, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4–9,10 However, the simplest approach to changing the LDOS of a light source is to modify the refractive index ( n ) of the medium in which it is embedded, which can easily be done in simple systems such as nanoparticle dispersions by using solvents with different values of n . 11–16 Indeed, an almost cubic dependence of Γ rad on the solvent refractive index has been observed, which has been classically explained by the use of local field cavity models. 17–20 Although this theoretical formalism can be applied to any luminescent nanoparticle, including dye-doped polymer beads or semiconductor quantum dots, most reported examples involve phosphor nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4–9,10 However, the simplest approach to changing the LDOS of a light source is to modify the refractive index ( n ) of the medium in which it is embedded, which can easily be done in simple systems such as nanoparticle dispersions by using solvents with different values of n . 11–16 Indeed, an almost cubic dependence of Γ rad on the solvent refractive index has been observed, which has been classically explained by the use of local field cavity models. 17–20 Although this theoretical formalism can be applied to any luminescent nanoparticle, including dye-doped polymer beads or semiconductor quantum dots, most reported examples involve phosphor nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2,3 Since then, a wide variety of optical materials made of dielectrics and metals, nanostructured at the scale of the targeted photon wavelength, have been used to manipulate the LDOS and thus modify the PL of nanomaterials, including semiconductor nanocrystals, organic molecules or rare earth (RE) phosphor nanoparticles. [4][5][6][7][8][9]10 However, the simplest approach to changing the LDOS of a light source is to modify the refractive index (n) of the medium in which it is embedded, which can easily be done in simple systems such as nanoparticle dispersions by using solvents with different values of n. [11][12][13][14][15][16] Indeed, an almost cubic dependence of Γ rad on the solvent refractive index has been observed, which has been classically explained by the use of local field cavity models. [17][18][19][20] Although this theoretical formalism can be applied to any luminescent nanoparticle, including dye-doped polymer beads or semiconductor quantum dots, most reported examples involve phosphor nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the aforementioned Lorentz virtual‐cavity model has been used to calculate f)(n$$ f(n) $$ for CdSe/ZnS semiconductor QDs [7, 8]. Second, the so‐called real‐cavity model has been used to obtain f)(n$$ f(n) $$ for Tm 3+ :LaF 3 nanocrystals [9] and for α‐NaYF 4 :Nd 3+ nanocrystals [10]. Third, the so‐called nanocrystal‐cavity model has been successfully used to calculate f)(n$$ f(n) $$ for LaPO 4 QDs doped with Ce 3+ or Tb 3+ ions [11] as well as for CdSe/CdS/CdZnS/ZnS semiconductor QDs [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%