2011
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2010.2084054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Low-Frequency Excess Flux Noise in DC SQUIDs at mK Temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

6
21
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fits of S È ðfÞ for (b) SQUID I.1 at 10 temperatures and (c) SQUID II.upturn for T < 0:15 K, and increases monotonically with R. In contrast, for chip II A 2 becomes independent of T for T & 0:6 K, a result reminiscent of the findings of Wellstood et al[18]. With regard to the slope, for both chips increases dramatically as T is lowered from 4.0 to 0.1 K. For chip I, the value of increases with R. Similarly low values of , 0.4-0.5 at 4 K, have been observed by other authors[17,28]. Although we have no explanation for the disparate dependencies of A 2 and on T, we remark that for chip I W is constant at 0:5 m while for chip II W varies from 15 to 240 m. A conceivable explanation is that interactions between spins give rise to spatial correlations.The progressive increase in as T is lowered is illustrated vividly in Figs.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fits of S È ðfÞ for (b) SQUID I.1 at 10 temperatures and (c) SQUID II.upturn for T < 0:15 K, and increases monotonically with R. In contrast, for chip II A 2 becomes independent of T for T & 0:6 K, a result reminiscent of the findings of Wellstood et al[18]. With regard to the slope, for both chips increases dramatically as T is lowered from 4.0 to 0.1 K. For chip I, the value of increases with R. Similarly low values of , 0.4-0.5 at 4 K, have been observed by other authors[17,28]. Although we have no explanation for the disparate dependencies of A 2 and on T, we remark that for chip I W is constant at 0:5 m while for chip II W varies from 15 to 240 m. A conceivable explanation is that interactions between spins give rise to spatial correlations.The progressive increase in as T is lowered is illustrated vividly in Figs.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Here, È is flux and & 1. Flux noise is a major source of intrinsic dephasing [7] in superconducting flux [8][9][10][11][12] and phase qubits [7,13,14] and in the quantronium [15]; it also generates low-frequency noise in SQUIDs [16][17][18].It has been proposed that flux noise originates from the random reversal of spins at the interfaces between the superconductor and its substrate and surface oxide layer [19][20][21]. Models that assume independent spins with a magnetic moment B (the Bohr magneton) predict an areal spin density of 5 Â 10 17 m À2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low-frequency excess noise, which does neither arise from I 0 nor from vortex fluctuations, has been reported during the last decades for SQUIDs based on conventional superconductors like Nb, Pb, PbIn and Al, in particular at temperatures well below 1 K 45 . This issue has recently been revived due to the increasing interest in the development of flux qubits and SQUIDs for ultralow temperature applications 46 . Various models have been suggested to describe the origin of such low-f excess noise, e.g.…”
Section: Fll Mode: DC Bias Vs Bias Reversalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade similar effect has been observed in nanoscale quantum circuits [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] . Remarkably, the noise magnitude appears to be "universal", i.e., of the same order of magnitude for a wide range of device sizes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%