1986
DOI: 10.1002/pola.1986.080240313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of miscibility by spectroscopic methods IV. How far is poly(vinyl chloride) miscible with s‐poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)? An answer from nonradiative energy transfer

Abstract: synopsisMiscibility of PVC with s.PMMA and SAN, respectively, has been investigated by nonradiative energy transfer. Blended by using a common solvent, the two polymer pairs are not homogeneous at a molecular level. They are likely to contain heterogeneities of a few nanometers depending on blend composition. A t a comparable number average molecular weight, but a different polydispersity, SAN i s seemingly less miscible with PVC than s.PMMA. That this behavior is of enthalpic or entropic origin, or mainly due… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rubber particles are elongated and spherical, which could be attributable to the easy flow of EPDM rubber of low crosslinking density. The average dimensions of the rubber particles vary from 0.1 to 0.5 μm, which is in accord with the report that effective toughening occurs at an optimum particle size of 0.1–1 μm for SAN 14. The vague interface indicates interfacial penetration between the two phases (i.e., grafting of the SAN molecular chain onto EPDM improves the miscibility between the two phases).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The rubber particles are elongated and spherical, which could be attributable to the easy flow of EPDM rubber of low crosslinking density. The average dimensions of the rubber particles vary from 0.1 to 0.5 μm, which is in accord with the report that effective toughening occurs at an optimum particle size of 0.1–1 μm for SAN 14. The vague interface indicates interfacial penetration between the two phases (i.e., grafting of the SAN molecular chain onto EPDM improves the miscibility between the two phases).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This blend was first studied by Shurer et al6, using dynamic mechanical analysis. Subsequently, the miscibility of the blend has been studied by thermally stimulated depolarization current method (TSDC),7 fluorescence nonradiative energy transfer,8 X‐ray diffraction9, and NMR 10. Theoretical studies have also been undertaken for this blend 11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluorescence technique, nonradiative energy transfer (NRET),3 has been applied to polymer blends by Albert et al 4 In this method the two polymers composing the blend are labeled with a donor and an acceptor. The efficiency of the energy transfer from donor to acceptor depends on the distance r-6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%