2020
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/44/8/084103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of neutron density distribution of 208Pb nucleus when the proton density is constrained to its experimental distribution

Abstract: In this study, two novel improvements for the theoretical calculation of neutron distributions are presented. First, the available experimental proton distributions are used as a constraint rather than inferred from the calculation. Second, the recently proposed distribution formula, d3pF, is used for the neutron density, which is more detailed than the usual shapes, for the first time in a nuclear structure calculation. A semi-microscopic approach for binding energy calculation is considered in this study. Ho… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The semi-microscopic approaches show remarkable success in the calculation of nuclear masses, deformation [26,[41][42][43][44], and nuclear decays [45][46][47][48]. However, the self-consistent models outperform other models in calculating the distributions of protons and neutrons as the sum of single-particle densities, and this justifies density fluctuation in practical charge distributions that cannot be described by common analytical formulae [49,50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semi-microscopic approaches show remarkable success in the calculation of nuclear masses, deformation [26,[41][42][43][44], and nuclear decays [45][46][47][48]. However, the self-consistent models outperform other models in calculating the distributions of protons and neutrons as the sum of single-particle densities, and this justifies density fluctuation in practical charge distributions that cannot be described by common analytical formulae [49,50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%