2003
DOI: 10.2172/822176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of novel geophysical techniques for monitoring CO<sub>2</sub> movement during sequestration. Final report, CRADA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Hoversten and Gasperikova (2006) report changes in modeled in-line surface electric fields due to the presence or absence of CO 2 on the order of 1.5% for injection of ~4 Mt (megatonnes) (~7x10 6 m 3 in situ) of CO 2 in sands at 1,100 m to 1,400 m depth, for a roving surface horizontal electric dipole source. Andréis and MacGregor (2010) found measurable seafloor electric field sensitivity to the withdrawal of 4×10 5 m 3 (~3×10 5 m 3 in situ) of natural gas from 1,100 m to 1,400 m below seafloor instruments.…”
Section: Section I: Numerical Modeling Of Borehole Source Csem At Aqumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hoversten and Gasperikova (2006) report changes in modeled in-line surface electric fields due to the presence or absence of CO 2 on the order of 1.5% for injection of ~4 Mt (megatonnes) (~7x10 6 m 3 in situ) of CO 2 in sands at 1,100 m to 1,400 m depth, for a roving surface horizontal electric dipole source. Andréis and MacGregor (2010) found measurable seafloor electric field sensitivity to the withdrawal of 4×10 5 m 3 (~3×10 5 m 3 in situ) of natural gas from 1,100 m to 1,400 m below seafloor instruments.…”
Section: Section I: Numerical Modeling Of Borehole Source Csem At Aqumentioning
confidence: 99%