2018
DOI: 10.2507/29th.daaam.proceedings.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Numerical Simulation Parameters on Fluid Flow Around Trash-Racks

Abstract: Trash-racks provide protection for hydraulic turbines by blocking entrance of large debris that could damage turbine parts. Trash-racks also help reduce fish injuries and mortality caused with fish entrapment in turbine. Installation of trash-racks is necessary, but causes inevitable head losses that decrease water turbine energy production. With increasing ecological concerns different bar-rack configurations are examined to provide better fish protection, mostly not considering head losses. Experimental resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As clarified in the previous section, after knowing the different speeds, the power ratings were verified, and the turbine efficiency was estimated using Eqs. (10), (11) and (12). Thus, 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑛𝑛 𝐼𝐼 = 23.77 𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 y 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑛𝑛 𝐼𝐼 = 6.62 𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 was used to predict a 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑛𝑛 𝑒𝑒𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑒𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡 = 30.39 𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 and a 𝑛𝑛ℎ = 86.3%, therefore, taking into account all the efficiencies, it is established a 𝑃𝑃 𝑠𝑠 = 20.74 𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘, which is considered to be in compliance with expectations.…”
Section: Hydraulic Designmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As clarified in the previous section, after knowing the different speeds, the power ratings were verified, and the turbine efficiency was estimated using Eqs. (10), (11) and (12). Thus, 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑛𝑛 𝐼𝐼 = 23.77 𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 y 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑛𝑛 𝐼𝐼 = 6.62 𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 was used to predict a 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑛𝑛 𝑒𝑒𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑒𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡 = 30.39 𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 and a 𝑛𝑛ℎ = 86.3%, therefore, taking into account all the efficiencies, it is established a 𝑃𝑃 𝑠𝑠 = 20.74 𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘, which is considered to be in compliance with expectations.…”
Section: Hydraulic Designmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In 2009, a 2D analysis showed an efficiency of 59.8%, for a flow rate of 0.255 m 3 /s and a rotational speed of 428.6 rpm. The analysis of the velocity vectors showed, again, the importance of the flow in the region adjacent to the blades [10]. In 2011, the velocity and pressure fields of the cross flow inside the runner were analyzed to characterize the performance at different velocities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Nascimento et al [54] performed simulations using the LES model with only two rectangular bars in a 2D domain to investigate the vortex shedding frequencies induced by the rack, but they excluded ξ in the analysis. Other researchers, including Ghamry and Katopodis [55], Paul and Adaramola [56], Jeethulakshmi et al [57], and Čarija et al [58], also performed simulations with the number of bars n ranging from 1 to 14, mainly using the RANS approach and 3D domains, and calculated ξ. Typically, the results overestimated ξ compared to the values derived from empirical formulas and previous model tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, an algorithm was designed and validated to study nonisothermal two-phase flow with free surface [13]. Research on numerical simulation parameters, geometry and mesh on fluid flow around a large number of trash-racks combinations and comparison with experimental results from literature has been reported recently [14]. An experimental method that can be used for investigation of mixing phenomena in double tee-junctions placed at different distances was reported by Lucin and coworkers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%