2016
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201600163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Oxygen Reduction Activity of Catalysts Derived from Co and Co/Zn Methyl‐Imidazolate Frameworks in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

Abstract: This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the Co@NC core–shell architectures, presence of both M–N–C and M–N active sites (CoN x C y and CoN x species), as observed from XPS analysis (Figure d), is also responsible factors for the enhanced ORR activity of Co@NC–MOF–2–900 catalyst . In view of the durability of Co@NC–MOF–2–900 electrocatalyst, N‐doped carbon shells greatly protect the Co nanoparticles, and hence preserve them from leaching out under highly oxidative alkaline and acidic environments . Though isolating the effect of individual factors responsible for the enhanced ORR activity is not possible at this stage, we believe that the synergistic effect of all factors are responsible for the ORR activity and excellent durability of Co@NC–MOF–2–900 electrocatalyst.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition to the Co@NC core–shell architectures, presence of both M–N–C and M–N active sites (CoN x C y and CoN x species), as observed from XPS analysis (Figure d), is also responsible factors for the enhanced ORR activity of Co@NC–MOF–2–900 catalyst . In view of the durability of Co@NC–MOF–2–900 electrocatalyst, N‐doped carbon shells greatly protect the Co nanoparticles, and hence preserve them from leaching out under highly oxidative alkaline and acidic environments . Though isolating the effect of individual factors responsible for the enhanced ORR activity is not possible at this stage, we believe that the synergistic effect of all factors are responsible for the ORR activity and excellent durability of Co@NC–MOF–2–900 electrocatalyst.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Apart from highly electrical conductive nanocarbon supports, non-carbon supports were also studied to template MOF crystals for catalyst preparation. Co/Zn-ZIF crystals are arrayed onto the surface of cobalt aluminum layered double hyroxide (CoAl-LDH) microplates to assemble two dimensional MOF hybrid precursors (Figure 13) [100,112]. Reprinted with permission from Ref.…”
Section: Non-carbon Templatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bimetallic (Co/Zn) ZIF precursor‐based Co−N−C catalyst derived utilizing Pluronic F‐127 surfactant (Co−N−C@F‐127) showed j l of ∼−3.9 mA cm −2 [6a] . Another bimetallic ZIF precursor derived Co−N−C catalyst achieved after post acid‐washing (Co/Zn(mIm) 2 ‐P) exhibited j l of ∼−4.8 mA cm −2 utilizing two heat treatment process under Ar and NH 3 atmosphere [38] . These comparisons demonstrate the efficacy and simplicity of the employed synthesis route utilizing dual ZIF precursor approach without usage of any additional surfactant, template and/or post acid‐treatment steps to prepare high performing CoNC catalyst.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%