2023
DOI: 10.1088/2631-8695/acd67a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of parameters and morphology of coated WC tool while machining X-750 using NSGA-II

Abstract: Nickel-based superalloys have numerous applications in automobile, aerospace, turbine blades, nuclear, oil refinery etc., due to their excellent properties like strength, wear resistance, corrosion resistance and higher creep strength. Because of these properties, modern manufacturing industries need help with the machining of nickel-based superalloys, i.e. hard-to-machine materials. In the present research, Ni-based X-750 alloy is machined with turning operation by a conventional lathe machine using a TiAlN P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table (22) summarizes the optimal conditions proposed by the four (04) applied optimization methods, namely: (DF), (MOORA), (VIKOR), and NSGA-II / VIKOR in intermittent turning of AISI D3 steel, along with the corresponding optimized responses. The analysis of the results reveals that the optimal condition (r = 1.29 mm, Vc = 240 m/min, f = 0.1 mm/rev, ap = 0.689 mm) derived from the (DF) approach yields minimized optimized responses for all six (06) output parameters (Ra, Pm, VB, Ct, Fz, and Lp) with values of (0.825 µm, 3282.085 Watt, 0.066 mm, 211.683 °C, 82.837 N, 108.158 dB) respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Of Optimal Conditions From the Four Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table (22) summarizes the optimal conditions proposed by the four (04) applied optimization methods, namely: (DF), (MOORA), (VIKOR), and NSGA-II / VIKOR in intermittent turning of AISI D3 steel, along with the corresponding optimized responses. The analysis of the results reveals that the optimal condition (r = 1.29 mm, Vc = 240 m/min, f = 0.1 mm/rev, ap = 0.689 mm) derived from the (DF) approach yields minimized optimized responses for all six (06) output parameters (Ra, Pm, VB, Ct, Fz, and Lp) with values of (0.825 µm, 3282.085 Watt, 0.066 mm, 211.683 °C, 82.837 N, 108.158 dB) respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Of Optimal Conditions From the Four Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is required to ascertain the physical, mechanical, chemical, and metallurgical (microstructure) qualities after performing the machining tests [36,37]. Figure 9 illustrates the uncoated and coated inserts' surface morphology by using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM).…”
Section: Microstructure Analysis Through Semmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has detailed the machining of different type of steels and parametric optimization [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. However, it is evident from the literature that limited work has been published on the milling of P20 mold steel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%