2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of possible societal risk associated with wind power generation systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…(37). The reporting quality of both content analyses differed: The report of Moura Carneiro et al (38) had a high risk of bias, while the one by Sovacool et al (37) had a low risk of bias. Sovacool et al (37) compared wind energy with other energy forms, and thus had a low risk of bias in regards to the eligibility of a comparison group.…”
Section: Construction and Operational/maintenance Phaseworking In Thementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(37). The reporting quality of both content analyses differed: The report of Moura Carneiro et al (38) had a high risk of bias, while the one by Sovacool et al (37) had a low risk of bias. Sovacool et al (37) compared wind energy with other energy forms, and thus had a low risk of bias in regards to the eligibility of a comparison group.…”
Section: Construction and Operational/maintenance Phaseworking In Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sovacool et al (37) compared wind energy with other energy forms, and thus had a low risk of bias in regards to the eligibility of a comparison group. For Moura Carneiro et al (38) there appeared to be a selection bias, and for Sovacool et al (37) a judgment regarding this type of bias could not been made. Both content analyses did not consider associated factors.…”
Section: Construction and Operational/maintenance Phaseworking In Thementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations