2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2020.100478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of processing parameters on tensile performance for FDM-printed carbon fiber reinforced polyamide 6 composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
41
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[30][31][32][33] However, in the case of FDM SFRPCs, the mutual effects of voids and bulk anisotropy induced by the reinforcement lead to an infill pattern dependence of the mechanical properties. [34][35][36][37][38] In the present investigation and according to the literature, 35,36 best performance in terms of E and σ m was obtained for raster angle 0 , while the 90 infill pattern produced the lowest properties with a percentage deterioration around 60%. The virgin and recycled AM_F±45 materials show the highest ε b , in agreement with the literature, 35 and approximately three times higher than for the respective AM_F0 materials.…”
Section: Tensile Test Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[30][31][32][33] However, in the case of FDM SFRPCs, the mutual effects of voids and bulk anisotropy induced by the reinforcement lead to an infill pattern dependence of the mechanical properties. [34][35][36][37][38] In the present investigation and according to the literature, 35,36 best performance in terms of E and σ m was obtained for raster angle 0 , while the 90 infill pattern produced the lowest properties with a percentage deterioration around 60%. The virgin and recycled AM_F±45 materials show the highest ε b , in agreement with the literature, 35 and approximately three times higher than for the respective AM_F0 materials.…”
Section: Tensile Test Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Several investigations show that the mechanical properties of net polymers such as ABS and PLA are not significantly influenced by the infill direction 30–33 . However, in the case of FDM SFRPCs, the mutual effects of voids and bulk anisotropy induced by the reinforcement lead to an infill pattern dependence of the mechanical properties 34–38 . In the present investigation and according to the literature, 35,36 best performance in terms of E and σ m was obtained for raster angle 0°, while the 90° infill pattern produced the lowest properties with a percentage deterioration around 60%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The FDM 3D printing technology is easy to operate, low cost, and has high material utilization, which is one of the most commonly used 3D printing technologies [ 62 ]. The disadvantage of the FDM 3D printing technology is that there are obvious stripes on the surface of the finished product, and the connection between layers is weak [ 63 , 64 , 65 ]. The conductive composites prepared with conductive carbon filler have excellent mechanical and conductive properties and have great application prospects in structural electronics, supercapacitors, and multi-shape conductive electrodes, etc.…”
Section: 3d Printing Of Conductive Carbon Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naranjo-Lozada et al [ 23 ] observed small improvements in tensile strength on specimens printed with chopped carbon fiber reinforced PA6 compared to unreinforced ones. Peng et al [ 34 ] observed that the printing bed temperature had a positive influence on the tensile strength of specimens printed with a tailor-made PA6 filament reinforced with 10% short carbon fibers. Handwerker et al [ 35 ] investigated the effect of annealing conditions on the mechanical properties of chopped carbon fiber-reinforced PA6 parts along the build-up direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%