2014
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4877(15)60019-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Quantum Correlations for A S = 1/2 Ising–Heisenberg Model on a Symmetrical Diamond Chain

Abstract: We consider the quantum correlations for a S=1/2 Ising-Heisenberg model of a symmetrical diamond chain. Firstly, we compare concurrence, quantum discord and 1-norm geometric quantum discord of an ideal diamond chain (J m = 0) in the absence of magnetic field. The results show no simple ordering relations between these quantum correlations, so that quantum discord may be smaller or larger than the 1-norm geometric quantum discord, which this observation contradict the previous result that provided by F. M. Paul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnetization curves, thus, for the Ising-Heisenberg spin systems share almost all features with the magnetization curves of the small spin clusters, but can contain much more intermediate magnetization plateaus. Various variants of the Ising-Heisenberg chains have been examined: diamond-chain, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] saw-tooth chain, 29,30 orthogonal-dimer chain, [31][32][33] tetrahedral chain, [34][35][36][37][38] and some special examples relevant to real magnetic materials. [39][40][41][42] In the present work, we will rigorously examine a magnetization process of a few quantum Heisenberg spin clusters and Ising-Heisenberg diamond chain, which will not display strict magnetization plateaus on assumption that some constituent spins have different Landé g-factors and may be a XY-anisotropy of the exchange interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetization curves, thus, for the Ising-Heisenberg spin systems share almost all features with the magnetization curves of the small spin clusters, but can contain much more intermediate magnetization plateaus. Various variants of the Ising-Heisenberg chains have been examined: diamond-chain, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] saw-tooth chain, 29,30 orthogonal-dimer chain, [31][32][33] tetrahedral chain, [34][35][36][37][38] and some special examples relevant to real magnetic materials. [39][40][41][42] In the present work, we will rigorously examine a magnetization process of a few quantum Heisenberg spin clusters and Ising-Heisenberg diamond chain, which will not display strict magnetization plateaus on assumption that some constituent spins have different Landé g-factors and may be a XY-anisotropy of the exchange interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of a certain over-simplification, the generalized version of the spin-1/2 Ising-Heisenberg diamond chain qualitatively reproduces magnetization, specific heat and susceptibility data reported on the azurite Cu 3 (CO 3 ) 2 (OH) 2 , which represents the most prominent experimental realization of the spin-1/2 diamond chain [3,4,5,6]. A lot of attention has been therefore paid to a comprehensive analysis of quantum and thermal entanglement [7,8,9,10,11], correlation functions [12], Lyapunov exponent [13], zeros of partition function [14], magnetocaloric effect [15], the influence of asymmetric [16,17], further-neighbor [18] and four-spin interactions [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…23 whereas they differ from the analogous ground states MD and QAF just by the symmetric (instead of antisymmetric) 24 quantum superposition of the antiferromagnetic states | ↑, ↓⟩ k and | ↓, ↑⟩ k of the Heisenberg spin pairs. The eigenenergies per primitive cell, which correspond to the respective ground states (19), follow from…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(4)), we can directly apply the transfer-matrix method [47,48]. For convenience we define the elements V ij of the 24 transfer matrix V as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%