2007
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Regional Mechanisms Responsible for Poor Oral Absorption in Humans of a Modified Release Preparation of the α-Adrenoreceptor Antagonist, 4-Amino-6,7-dimethoxy-2-(5-methanesulfonamido-1,2,3,4 tetrahydroisoquinol-2-yl)-5-(2-pyridyl)quinazoline (UK-338,003): The Rational Use of ex Vivo Intestine to Predict in Vivo Absorption

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Modified release (MR) formulations are used to enhance the safety and compliance of existing drugs by improving their pharmacokinetics. Predicting the likely success of MR formulations is often difficult before clinical studies. A systematic in vitro approach using mouse and human tissues was adopted to rationalize the in vivo pharmacokinetics of 9-and 15-h MR formulations of an ␣-adrenoreceptor antagonist, 4-amino-6,7-dimethoxy-2-(5-methanesulfonamido-1,2,3,4 tetrahydroisoquinol-2-yl)-5-(2-pyridyl)qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, net drug absorption is achieved through multiple uptake and effl ux transporters along with passive transcellular diffusion in the intestinal barrier (Lennernas, 2003(Lennernas, , 2007. Effl ux transporters located on the apical brush border membrane of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, such as P-gp, MRP2 and BCRP, are considered barriers to intestinal drug absorption (Figure 8.3) (Higgins, 2001;Dietrich et al, 2003;Kunta and Sinko, 2004;Tanaka et al, 2005;Collett et al, 2008). On the other hand, various SLC transporters are expressed in enterocytes and involved in the intestinal absorption of therapeutics (Tamai et al, 2000;Walters et al, 2000;Kullak-Ublick and Becker, 2003).…”
Section: Transporter Effects On Intestinal Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Generally, net drug absorption is achieved through multiple uptake and effl ux transporters along with passive transcellular diffusion in the intestinal barrier (Lennernas, 2003(Lennernas, , 2007. Effl ux transporters located on the apical brush border membrane of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, such as P-gp, MRP2 and BCRP, are considered barriers to intestinal drug absorption (Figure 8.3) (Higgins, 2001;Dietrich et al, 2003;Kunta and Sinko, 2004;Tanaka et al, 2005;Collett et al, 2008). On the other hand, various SLC transporters are expressed in enterocytes and involved in the intestinal absorption of therapeutics (Tamai et al, 2000;Walters et al, 2000;Kullak-Ublick and Becker, 2003).…”
Section: Transporter Effects On Intestinal Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To obtain kinetic data in human intestinal ex vivo tissues is a considerably greater challenge than in in vitro systems as there are often limited supplies of macroscopically normal fresh human intestinal tissue to quantify abundance and substrate kinetics. Ussing chamber studies are undertaken to elucidate drug transport and to assess regional differences in human functional expression . Bi‐directional permeability experiments in Ussing chambers are routinely performed with n = 2 to 3 samples from a single donor where a subsequent efflux ratio can be determined.…”
Section: Pbpk‐ivive Linked Models Of Intestinal Transportersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative methods to intubation are reviewed in the literature and will not be discussed here [27]. The purpose of this study is not to compare and contrast those methods or alternative intubation techniques [28–30] with those included in this manuscript. Rather by review of our experience, this study shows that some method to estimate a candidate's bioavailability after administration to the colon is helpful in the development for CR formulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%