Investigation of Seawater Reverse Osmosis Fouling and Its Relationship To Pretreatment Type

Abstract

Desalination of seawater using reverse osmosis (RO) technology is an important option available to water-scarce coastal regions. A major challenge to seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) is membrane productivity decline due to fouling. Systematic studies in the area of SWRO fouling are lacking as compared to RO fouling by freshwater. The effect of the type of pretreatment employed ahead of the SWRO process has been recognized to be of critical importance in SWRO fouling. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of pretreatment on SWRO performance using bench scale experiments. The effect of different pretreatment strategies on SWRO flux decline was simulated using prefiltration of the SWRO feedwater using different filtration size ranges. The prefiltration size ranges used were selected to mimic the size fractions associated with different SWRO pretreatment processes. It was found that particulate matter greater than 1 microm (representing media filtration) caused most of the RO fouling. On the other hand, significant reduction in fouling was observed when membrane filtration was used (microfiltration represented by 0.1 microm prefiltration and ultrafiltration represented by 100 kDa prefiltration). There was no significant difference in flux decline between these two membrane filtration types. The lowest RO flux decline was observed when a tight ultrafiltration membrane (20 kDa) was used as prefiltration. The RO fouling observed was modeled using the gel layertheory, which could be used to satisfactorily describe fouling by different dissolved fractions of seawater. The observed SWRO fouling trends were confirmed using specially adapted attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy of the fouled membrane surface.

Performance and fate of organics in a pilot MBR–NF for treating antibiotic production wastewater with recycling NF concentrate

“…However, a new peak appeared at $1380 cm À1 , indicating residual nitrate from the biological treatment, and could be seen in the MBR effluent in both the 1st and 2nd stages (Gur-Reznik et al, 2008). The peaks at $3420 cm À1 for biological wastewater treatment are attributed to the stretching of the O-H bond in hydroxyl functional groups (Kumar et al, 2006). Two absorption bands in the MBR effluent in the 2nd stage were observed near 1052 and 1157 cm À1 and assigned to the C-O bond of ethers or carboxylic acid, probably a polysaccharide.…”

Transparent Exopolymer Particles (TEP): an overlooked factor in the process of biofilm formation in aquatic environments

“…Minimizing biofilm development and accumulation is a major concern in desalination and water treatment industries (Flemming 1997, Kumar et al 2006. The build-up of a biofilm layer due to microbial growth, deposition of colloidal matter and adsorption of organics on RO, NF and UF membrane surfaces leads to the deterioration of filtration efficiency and eventually the need to replace the membranes.…”

Cellulose acetate based Eco friendly membrane preparation and its application studies

“…Besides, it has become a viable technology for wastewater reclamation 2 . These advances mainly include developments in membrane properties and module design, process design, feed pre-treatment, energy recovery devices, and operational strategies focused in energy consumption reductions 3,4 .…”