2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ecce.2015.7309997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of stabilities of Lyapunov-Based digital control for grid-connected inverter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example of such a control method is the energy function-based Lyapunov function method. [5][6][7][8] While energy function-based control methods are stable, design freedom is partially sacrificed to ensure stability and there is a disadvantage in that the tracking of the output current to the sinusoidal waveform is loose. 7 Conventionally, control methods that are both stable and that have tracking performance to the sinusoidal waveform are desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of such a control method is the energy function-based Lyapunov function method. [5][6][7][8] While energy function-based control methods are stable, design freedom is partially sacrificed to ensure stability and there is a disadvantage in that the tracking of the output current to the sinusoidal waveform is loose. 7 Conventionally, control methods that are both stable and that have tracking performance to the sinusoidal waveform are desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the output admittance of the grid inverter is passive, that is, the conductance component of the frequency characteristics is constantly positive and the variation range of the phase is within ±90°, Nyquist's stability condition will always be satisfied and stability can always be ensured, regardless of the grid impedance value. An example of such a control method is the energy function‐based Lyapunov function method . While energy function‐based control methods are stable, design freedom is partially sacrificed to ensure stability and there is a disadvantage in that the tracking of the output current to the sinusoidal waveform is loose …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%