2022
DOI: 10.5194/esurf-10-473-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of stochastic-threshold incision models across a climatic and morphological gradient

Abstract: Abstract. Long-term landscape evolution is controlled by tectonic and climatic forcing acting through surface processes. Rivers are the main drivers of continental denudation because they set the base level of most hillslopes. The mechanisms of fluvial incision are thus a key focus in geomorphological research and require accurate representation and models. River incision is often modeled with a stream power model (SPM) based on the along-stream evolution of drainage area and channel elevation gradient but can… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are now many studies testing the utility of the STIM (e.g., Campforts et al., 2020; Desormeaux et al., 2022; DiBiase & Whipple, 2011; Forte et al., 2022; Marder & Gallen, 2023; Scherler et al., 2017). However, we believe this paper is the first attempt to modify a longitudinal profile version of STIM to allow for stochastic events in space as well as time, which we refer to as spatial‐STIM.…”
Section: River Incision Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are now many studies testing the utility of the STIM (e.g., Campforts et al., 2020; Desormeaux et al., 2022; DiBiase & Whipple, 2011; Forte et al., 2022; Marder & Gallen, 2023; Scherler et al., 2017). However, we believe this paper is the first attempt to modify a longitudinal profile version of STIM to allow for stochastic events in space as well as time, which we refer to as spatial‐STIM.…”
Section: River Incision Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if erosional thresholds matter, nonlinearity is also linked to the temporal variability of streamflow (Lague, 2014; Lague et al., 2005; Tucker, 2004). As such, there has been increasing interest in examining how such stochastic‐threshold models (stochastic‐threshold incision models (STIM)) of river incision can be applied to empirical relationships between equilibrium channel steepness and long term erosion rates (Campforts et al., 2020; Desormeaux et al., 2022; DiBiase et al., 2010; Forte et al., 2022; Marder & Gallen, 2023; Scherler et al., 2017). Yet there has been less attention given to how orographic gradients in temporal dynamics may similarly alter predictions from simple stream power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of how stochastic processes are represented, these early efforts prompted a large number of studies to take a closer look at whether relationships between long-term erosion rates and river morphology can be better explained using stochastic-threshold models of river incision (Campforts et al, 2020;Desormeaux et al, 2022;DiBiase & Whipple, 2011;Forte et al, 2022;Scherler et al, 2017). While success is decidedly mixed, the general outcome of using stochastic-threshold models has been to provide an alternative interpretation to nonlinear relationships between river channel morphology and long-term erosion rates (Harel et al, 2016;Marder & Gallen, 2023).…”
Section: Stochastic River Incisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deriving this reference flow, however, can be challenging at ungauged locations. Previous studies have used satellite‐based measurements of mean annual precipitation (MAP) as a proxy for calculating discharge at ungauged locations (Desormeaux et al, 2022; Rossi et al, 2016). Comparing MAP – calculated by averaging the mean annual precipitation between 1963 and 1995 obtained from the PRISM data set (PRISM Climate Group, 2022) across the respective location's drainage basin – to the MAQ at the known USGS gauging locations reveals that MAP is a good proxy ( r 2 = 0.82) for predicting MAQ in Puerto Rico when assuming a power‐law relationship (Figure 5, Supporting Information Figure S1).…”
Section: Proof Of Concept and Application In Puerto Ricomentioning
confidence: 99%