2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.05.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of stress exponent in the power-law creep of Pb–Sb alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown experimentally that both stress and temperature dependencies of the steady-state impression velocity agree with the corresponding dependencies of the creep rate in conventional creep tests. [25][26][27] Therefore, inserting Eq. 4 into 1 and rearranging gives the relationship between impression velocity and applied punch stress as…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown experimentally that both stress and temperature dependencies of the steady-state impression velocity agree with the corresponding dependencies of the creep rate in conventional creep tests. [25][26][27] Therefore, inserting Eq. 4 into 1 and rearranging gives the relationship between impression velocity and applied punch stress as…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solidification processing parameters (G, V) of alloys directly affect λ 1 , λ 2 , and R of the alloys and also significantly influence their mechanical behaviors. Hence, the effects of solidification processing and microstructure parameters on mechanical behaviors have been studied intensively [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the large difference in the test methodology, it has been shown that, under steady state conditions (hardness is constant for a constant strain rate), the exponents N and n are close for the same materials. [44][45][46][47] Note that Equation 3 requires the hardness to be measured throughout the hold period; this is not practical in QS nanoindentation because the unloading stiffness is undetermined during the hold period. Prior research has shown that the nominal pressure p nom , which is determined directly from the total indentation depth h, p nom ∼ = P/24.5h 2 , can be used to accurately estimate the stress exponent.…”
Section: A3842mentioning
confidence: 99%