2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of structural stability, elastic properties, electronic structure and ferrimagnetic behavior of Mn2RhGe full-Heusler alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thermodynamic stability and the possibility of synthesizing the structure Sr 0.875 Mn 0.125 O are resolved by the formation and cohesive energy, [ 40,41 ] to validate the phase stability of the Sr 0.875 Mn 0.125 O structure, we have computed the formation and cohesive energies employing the following formula [ 12,13,16–20,42–60 ] EformSr0.875Mn0.125O=EtotalSr0.875Mn0.125O0.875EsolidSr+0.125EsolidMn+EsolidO$$\begin{eqnarray} E_{form}^{S{r}_{0.875}M{n}_{0.125}O} = E_{total}^{S{r}_{0.875}M{n}_{0.125}O} - \left[ {0.875E_{solid}^{Sr} + 0.125E_{solid}^{Mn} + E_{solid}^O} \right]\nonumber\\ \end{eqnarray}$$ EcohSr0.875Mn0.125O=0.875EatomSr+0.125EatomMn+EatomOEtotalSr0.875Mn0.125O$$\begin{eqnarray} E_{coh}^{S{r}_{0.875}M{n}_{0.125}O} = \left[ {0.875E_{atom}^{Sr} + 0.125E_{atom}^{Mn} + E_{atom}^O} \right] - E_{total}^{S{r}_{0.875}M{n}_{0.125}O}\nonumber\\ \end{eqnarray}$$…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The thermodynamic stability and the possibility of synthesizing the structure Sr 0.875 Mn 0.125 O are resolved by the formation and cohesive energy, [ 40,41 ] to validate the phase stability of the Sr 0.875 Mn 0.125 O structure, we have computed the formation and cohesive energies employing the following formula [ 12,13,16–20,42–60 ] EformSr0.875Mn0.125O=EtotalSr0.875Mn0.125O0.875EsolidSr+0.125EsolidMn+EsolidO$$\begin{eqnarray} E_{form}^{S{r}_{0.875}M{n}_{0.125}O} = E_{total}^{S{r}_{0.875}M{n}_{0.125}O} - \left[ {0.875E_{solid}^{Sr} + 0.125E_{solid}^{Mn} + E_{solid}^O} \right]\nonumber\\ \end{eqnarray}$$ EcohSr0.875Mn0.125O=0.875EatomSr+0.125EatomMn+EatomOEtotalSr0.875Mn0.125O$$\begin{eqnarray} E_{coh}^{S{r}_{0.875}M{n}_{0.125}O} = \left[ {0.875E_{atom}^{Sr} + 0.125E_{atom}^{Mn} + E_{atom}^O} \right] - E_{total}^{S{r}_{0.875}M{n}_{0.125}O}\nonumber\\ \end{eqnarray}$$…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C 44 modulus enables the determination of various properties, including fragility, and embodies elasticity in a specific manner, [ 65 ] It is directly proportional to the shear modulus and serves as a useful metric for quantifying shear strain. [ 53 ] While C 11 and C 12 provide unambiguous responses to uniaxial compression. Our findings reveal that the C 11 constant holds a higher value compared to C 44 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H=true(12νtrue)E6true(1+νtrue)
Fig. 12Hardness values predicted by Yousef's approximation organized by magnetic moment (calculated from the Slater-Pauling rule) for stable Heusler alloys predicted using quantum mechanics simulations [3, 4, 7, 14, 15, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89,
…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among full-Heusler alloys there have been revealed a half-metallic feature [7][8][9]. Halfmetallic Heusler alloys [10,11] have been of great interest due to their ferromagnetic properties and halfmetallic character with 100% spin polarization, implying that they are promising materials for exploitation in the spintronic applications [11][12][13]. The half-metallic ferrimagnetic Heusler alloys are much more desirable than the other compounds for magneto-electronic applications [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…216 (type Xa) [22]. For the L2 1 prototype structure, the most electronegative element X occupies the position of the Wyckoff position 8c (¼, ¼, ¼), Y is at 4b (½, ½, ½), and Z is at 4a (0, 0, 0) [11,21,22]. The X a -type has four inequivalent positions in the unit cell, where the X 1 occupy 4d (¼, ¼, ¼), Y in 4c (¾, ¾, ¾), X 2 in 4b (½, ½, ½), and Z in 4a (0, 0, 0) [11,21,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%