18th Joint Propulsion Conference 1982
DOI: 10.2514/6.1982-1042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of subsonic nacelle performance improvement concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantity is about 0.8~1.1% for real engine [4]. It's really a big thrust loss as it is equivalent with 3~4 drag counts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The quantity is about 0.8~1.1% for real engine [4]. It's really a big thrust loss as it is equivalent with 3~4 drag counts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The nacelle is calibrated in the Flight Simulation Chamber to determine the nozzle performance, including velocity coefficient and discharge coefficient. The coefficients are used for calculating the thrust loss and internal drag of nozzle [4]. The accuracy of the coefficients is very important for the nacelle internal drag calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aerodynamic pressure and viscous forces exerted on the walls of the exhaust system can have a significant impact on the gross propulsive force F G . According to Dusa et al ( 10 ) , the reduction in F G due to non-isentropic flow conditions can reach approximately 1.5–2.0% relative to the case of ideal flow expansion to ambient static pressure. It is standard practice to quote the aerodynamic behaviour of an exhaust system relative to that of an ideal nozzle through the definition of the non-dimensional discharge and velocity coefficients, C D and C V , respectively ( 11 , 12 ) .…”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gross propulsive force F G produced by the exhaust system can be substantially influenced by the aerodynamic pressure and viscous forces exerted on the walls of the bypass duct and nozzle, core after-body, and protruding core plug. Dusa et al [4] reported that for high-bypass ratio turbofan engines, the gross thrust loss due to non-isentropic flow conditions can be of the order of 1.5-2.0% relative to the ideal case of fully-expanded isentropic flow. To establish a standard accounting process, it is common practice to compare the actual nozzle performance with that of an ideal nozzle through the definition of the nondimensional discharge and velocity coefficients, C D and C V , respectively [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%