2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2011.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of sulfur poisoning of CNx oxygen reduction catalysts for PEM fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
31
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…27 In addition, a marked decrease in activity was noted for FeNC catalysts after H 2 S treatment 28 providing evidence that iron is an essential part of the ORR active site in these catalysts unlike CN x catalysts where no decrease in activity was observed after sulfur exposure. 29 Though the above-mentioned studies by our group were significant in highlighting that FeNC and CN x catalysts are indeed two distinct classes of NNMCs and have very different active sites, the actual ORR active sites in both materials continue to be a subject of contention. One of first active site model for FeNC materials was proposed by Dodelet's group where it was suggested that the iron is stabilized by the presence of two pyridinic nitrogen atoms (phenanthroline-type active site).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…27 In addition, a marked decrease in activity was noted for FeNC catalysts after H 2 S treatment 28 providing evidence that iron is an essential part of the ORR active site in these catalysts unlike CN x catalysts where no decrease in activity was observed after sulfur exposure. 29 Though the above-mentioned studies by our group were significant in highlighting that FeNC and CN x catalysts are indeed two distinct classes of NNMCs and have very different active sites, the actual ORR active sites in both materials continue to be a subject of contention. One of first active site model for FeNC materials was proposed by Dodelet's group where it was suggested that the iron is stabilized by the presence of two pyridinic nitrogen atoms (phenanthroline-type active site).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Another approach to gain information about the active site by electrochemical measurements can be achieved by controlled catalyst poisoning where certain poisons, e.g. sulfur 58, 179 or cyanide 180, affect only certain active site structures.…”
Section: Evaluation and Characterization Of Npmcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XAS is another powerful method for characterizing the local atomic structure of NPMCs. It is far more widely used than Mössbauer spectroscopy and both XANES and EXAFS techniques of XAS provide useful information 51, 56, 57, 80, 107, 108, 111, 179. A difficulty in both XAS and Mössbauer spectroscopy characterization is that they are bulk averaging techniques, and that NPMCs oftentimes may contain several different active site structures as well as inactive structures containing the probed element type, which are very challenging to separate from each other.…”
Section: Evaluation and Characterization Of Npmcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of well-established differences, the question of the active site and the role of the metal in these two classes of catalysts continues to linger. Additional studies were performed to probe the active site in both materials using H 2 S, a well-known poison [42,43]. Activity loss in iron-based catalysts has been attributed to sulfur for many well-known reactions such as Fisher-Tropsch, water-gas shift, ammonia synthesis, ammonia decomposition and iron carburization [44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Use Of H 2 S Poisoning As a Probementioning
confidence: 99%