2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the Aerodynamic Analysis of Super Long–Span Bridges by Using ERA-Based Reduced-Order Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are consistent with the capability of the 2DoF [13] and 6DoF [14] HIL systems already available at Politecnico di Milano designed for simulating the motion of a 10MW floating wind turbine [15] with a length scale factor of 75 and a frequency scale factor of 1/25, which makes the motion of the scaled model working the sample displacement and frequency range of a possible floating bridge with the scale factors considered in the paper. For more details about the scaling procedure adopted for floating wind turbines, the reader is referred to [15]. For the sake of completeness in Table 2 …”
Section: Application To Aeroelastic Model Of the Bridgesupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data are consistent with the capability of the 2DoF [13] and 6DoF [14] HIL systems already available at Politecnico di Milano designed for simulating the motion of a 10MW floating wind turbine [15] with a length scale factor of 75 and a frequency scale factor of 1/25, which makes the motion of the scaled model working the sample displacement and frequency range of a possible floating bridge with the scale factors considered in the paper. For more details about the scaling procedure adopted for floating wind turbines, the reader is referred to [15]. For the sake of completeness in Table 2 …”
Section: Application To Aeroelastic Model Of the Bridgesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…(from [15]) From an aerodynamic point of view, the multi-box decks have better performances in terms of stability and buffeting responses, because of their smaller aerodynamic coefficients. As an example, Table 1 shows the derivatives of the lift and moment coefficients (KL and KM) for the 3 previous sections, having considered for each section its own chord width in the definition of the coefficients.…”
Section: Aeroelastic Stability Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These response surface methods have been used also in the probabilistic torsional flutter [8] and coupled flutter [2,9] analyses considering structural parameter uncertainties. Moreover, a reduced order model developed by [10] utilizes the impulse response of the cross section obtained from CFD simulations, provides an efficient approach to predict the aerodynamic response of a bridge section. However, the model is unable to capture the nonlinear dynamic behaviour due to linearisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of applying ROMs into aerodynamic analysis was formed in the 80s, starting with moment matching methods based on Arnoldi, Lanczos and rational Krylov procedures (Antoulas, 1986) and developing to singular value decomposition (SVD)-based methods such as proper orthogonal decomposition (Tang and Kholodar, 2001; Rowley, 2005), eigensystem realization algorithm (ERA) (Silva and Raveh, 2001; Silva and Bartels, 2004; Gaitonde and Jones, 2006; Kim, 2005), balanced truncation (Raveh, 2001) and singular perturbations (Allen et al , 2005). For more information on different ROMs, the reader is referred to Ebrahimnejad et al (2014a) and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have recently showed the results of ERA-based aerodynamic ROM for a long-span bridge with and without guide vanes (Ebrahimnejad et al , 2012). Also, this procedure has been successfully applied to a bridge section and two simple canonical sections with the same chord length in Ebrahimnejad et al (2014a) and three super long-span bridges in Ebrahimnejad et al (2014b). This work develops the method proposed in Ebrahimnejad et al (2014a, 2012, 2014b) to perform aeroelastic analysis by coupling a pertinent aerodynamic ROM and compatible reduced DOF structural system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%