Investigation of the Bioconcentration Factor of Endosulfan for Rice from Soil

Choi, Geun‐Hyoung; Leedeukyeong,; Ryu, Song Hee; Ro, Jin‐Ho; 박병준,; Moon, Byeong-Churl; Kim, Jin Hyo

doi:10.7585/kjps.2018.22.1.25

Cited by 12 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although both of the plant uptake experiments were not performed on the same soil condition, the PUFs for PFOA and PFOS in spinach were similar values with the previously reported in rice straw (0.769-1.474 for PFOA and 1.749-4.700 for PFOS) [7]. In addition, the PUFs for the PFAAs were at least 10-fold higher than those for endosulfan and other organochlorine POPs [5,8,9,15]. Due to the ionic functional group of PFOA and PFOS, the PFAAs have higher hydrophilicity and ionic charges than the organochlorine POPs and these chemical properties would result to higher PUFs in crops through a different pathway for the uptake and accumulation with non-polar organochlorine POPs [22,34].…”

Section: Vegetable C Soil ---------------------supporting

confidence: 82%

Comparison of the plant uptake factor of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) from the three different concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in soil to spinach and Welsh onion

Lee

Choi²,

Rho³

et al. 2020

JABC

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The long-chained perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), are a potential exposure risk in the environment, specifically for humans due to high levels of bioaccumulation, persistence, and toxicity. In the current study, the plant uptake factors (PUFs) of spinach and Welsh onion were investigated on the three different concentration levels of PFOA and PFOS in soil. Spinach and Welsh onion were divided into three residue groups, a control group and two levels of PFOA and PFOS. The PFAAs spiked soils were aged for six months and the extractable residue of PFOS in the aged soil was reduced to 30-59% of the initial spiked concentrations for PFOS, while PFOA showed almost the same initial spiked concentrations. The PUFs for PFOA and PFOS were 0.111-2.821 and 0.047-3.175 for spinach, and 0.203-0.738 and 0.035-0.181 for Welsh onion, respectively. The highest PUF values in both vegetable were displayed when the residual concentration of PFAAs were part-per-billion (ppb) or sub-ppb in soil.

show abstract

Section: Vegetable C Soil ---------------------supporting

confidence: 82%

Comparison of the plant uptake factor of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) from the three different concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in soil to spinach and Welsh onion

Lee

Choi²,

Rho³

et al. 2020

JABC

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…성이 증가하고 있다. 토양 잔류 endosulfan의 작물 흡수이행은 생물농축계수 (bioconcentration factor)나 식물흡수이행계수(plant uptake factor, PUF)를 산출하여 활용하고 있으며, 지금까지 시금치, 당근, 무, 감자 등 채소류와 쌀 등 곡류에서 endosulfan의 흡수이행에 관 한 연구 결과가 일부 보고된 바 있다 [2,3,6,17,18]. 하지만 Fig.…”

unclassified

Effect of soil organic matter content on plant uptake factor of ginseng for endosulfan

Choi

Bae

et al. 2020

JABC

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In our study, it was detected at a level of 0.006-0.040 ppm, and the detection frequency was 7.5% (Table 7). For endosulfan, a report on the translocation from soil to rice farming has been reported [35], and two concentrations, 3 and 10 mg kg −1 , were found in paddy soils, showing 0.546 and 1.258 mg kg −1 of endosulfan in the rice straw, respectively. However, endosulfan was not found in brown rice.…”

Section: Residual Pesticides In 40 Korean Agricultural Soilsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Multiresidue Pesticides in Agricultural Paddy Soils Near Industrial Areas in Korea by GC–MS/MS and LC–MS/MS Using QuEChERS Extraction with dSPE Clean-Up

Park

Jeon

et al. 2021

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pesticides have been used to control pests in agricultural fields and storage systems before circulating agricultural products to markets. A tandem mass spectrometry, equipped with gas chromatographic separation (GC–MS/MS) or ultra-performance liquid chromatographic separation (LC–MS/MS), was used to monitor residual pesticides in Korean rice paddy soils. Selective multiple reaction monitoring was employed during the analyses to achieve multiresidue pesticide analysis using GC–MS/MS and LC–MS/MS of 342 pesticides. In this study, QuEChERS extraction was employed with a dSPE clean-up to establish an effective pretreatment process. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were set up for all pesticides, and method validation was performed for linearity and recovery at levels of 10 and 50 mg kg−1 in the untreated soil sample. All pesticides satisfied the acceptable recovery range of 70–120%, within less than 20% RSD values, except for ametoctradin and gibberellic acid. In the paddy soil analyses, tricyclazole was the most frequently detectable pesticide, followed by oxadiazon, endosulfan, and chlorantraniliprole. Continuous monitoring of residual pesticides in paddy soils should be conducted due to the translocation of some systemic pesticides from soils to crop plants, and the impact of residual pesticides on the environment.

show abstract

Investigation of the Bioconcentration Factor of Endosulfan for Rice from Soil

Cited by 12 publications

References 13 publications

Comparison of the plant uptake factor of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) from the three different concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in soil to spinach and Welsh onion

Comparison of the plant uptake factor of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) from the three different concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in soil to spinach and Welsh onion

Effect of soil organic matter content on plant uptake factor of ginseng for endosulfan

Analysis of Multiresidue Pesticides in Agricultural Paddy Soils Near Industrial Areas in Korea by GC–MS/MS and LC–MS/MS Using QuEChERS Extraction with dSPE Clean-Up

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About