2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the C-terminal domain of the bacterial DNA-(adenine N6)-methyltransferase CcrM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mutants E280A and G305A display near-WT like K d’s on dsDNA. Our results for the mutants S315A, H317A, N330A and R350A differ with prior work on these mutants, reporting improved binding affinity over the WT enzyme using the same DNA and similar buffer conditions ( 28 , 29 ). Importantly, the prior work reported an extremely weak DNA affinity for the WT CcrM enzyme (2–10 μM compared to 75 nM shown in Supplementary Table S1 ), which may have resulted from using impure protein or only partially active enzyme ( 13 ).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mutants E280A and G305A display near-WT like K d’s on dsDNA. Our results for the mutants S315A, H317A, N330A and R350A differ with prior work on these mutants, reporting improved binding affinity over the WT enzyme using the same DNA and similar buffer conditions ( 28 , 29 ). Importantly, the prior work reported an extremely weak DNA affinity for the WT CcrM enzyme (2–10 μM compared to 75 nM shown in Supplementary Table S1 ), which may have resulted from using impure protein or only partially active enzyme ( 13 ).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore purified the WT and all mutants using a C-terminal His-tag, resulting in high concentrations and purity ( Supplementary Figure S3 ). The purity of the proteins discussed here is significantly greater than previously published work which may contribute to the different results and conclusions ( 28 , 29 ).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Both SAND and PWWP domains were demonstrated to bind DNA nonspecifically 27,28 . Moreover, the C-terminal domain of CcrM was suggested to be involved in DNA binding 29 and deletion of the domain results in loss of enzymatic activity 15 . Indeed, in the current DNA-bound CcrM structure, molecule B provides almost all DNA phosphate contacts of the non-target strand, with interactions mediated by the C-terminal domain concentrated on the four 5’ phosphates surrounding the recognition sequence (Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4a and b ). The methylated DNA substrate was prepared by in vitro DNA methylation of the unmethylated substrate with purified His 6 -tagged CcrM 46 . Methylation of the PCR product (60 ng μl −1 ) was performed in reaction buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, and 5 μg ml −1 BSA) supplemented with 200 μM S-adenosyl- L -methionine (Sigma) and 5 μM CcrM for 1 h at room temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%