2004
DOI: 10.1002/cjoc.20040221009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the crystallization kinetics of Zn(Met)(AcO)2·H2O in mixed solution of water and acetone by microcalorimetry

Abstract: The crystal growth process of 2n(Met)(A~O)~*H20 from the mixed solution of water and acetone has been investigated using a Calvet microcalorimeter. The heat produced and the rate of heat production during the crystal growth process at 298.15, 301.15, 304.15,307.15 and 310.15 K have been measured. On the basis of experimental and calculated results, the thermodynamics parameters (the apparent activation enthalpy, the activation entropy, and the activation free energy), the rate constant and the kinetic paramete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calorimetric system was accurate (accuracy 0.02%) and reliable (precision 0.3%). The Cd(NO 3 ) 2 and Na 2 MoO 4 microemulsions were placed in a stainless steel sample cell in separate 15-mL containers [31]. The Na 2 MoO 4 microemulsion (1.0 mL) was placed in a small glass tube above the Cd(NO 3 ) 2 microemulsion (1.0 mL), which was in a larger glass tube.…”
Section: In Situ Microcalorimetric Methods and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calorimetric system was accurate (accuracy 0.02%) and reliable (precision 0.3%). The Cd(NO 3 ) 2 and Na 2 MoO 4 microemulsions were placed in a stainless steel sample cell in separate 15-mL containers [31]. The Na 2 MoO 4 microemulsion (1.0 mL) was placed in a small glass tube above the Cd(NO 3 ) 2 microemulsion (1.0 mL), which was in a larger glass tube.…”
Section: In Situ Microcalorimetric Methods and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theaccuracywas0.02%andtheprecisionwas0.3%,whichin鄄 dicatedthatthecalorimetricsystemwasaccurateandreliable. ThesynthesisreagentsofCaCl 2 aqueoussolutionandNa 2 MoO 4 aqueoussolutionwereputintothestainlesssteelsamplecell withthecontainerof15mL [26] ,separately. 3a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microcalorimeter was calibrated first using the Joule effect. Calorimetric system was accurate (accuracy 0.02%) and reliable (precision 0.3%) [48,49]. The chrysin solution (1.0 mL, 1 × 10 -4 mol•L -1 ) was placed in a small glass tube above the SA (1.0 mL, 2.0 × 10 -4 mol•L -1 ), which was in a larger glass tube.…”
Section: Determination Of Thermodynamic Parameters By Microcalorimetermentioning
confidence: 99%