2021
DOI: 10.3390/biom11040544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the Differences in Antithrombin to Heparin Binding among Antithrombin Budapest 3, Basel, and Padua Mutations by Biochemical and In Silico Methods

Abstract: Antithrombin (AT) is a serine protease inhibitor, its activity is highly accelerated by heparin. Mutations at the heparin-binding region lead to functional defect, type II heparin-binding site (IIHBS) AT deficiency. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the molecular background of AT Budapest 3 (p.Leu131Phe, ATBp3), AT Basel (p.Pro73Leu), and AT Padua (p.Arg79His) mutations. Advanced in silico methods and heparin-binding studies of recombinant AT proteins using surface plasmon resonance method w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A heterozygous mutation within this peptide was thus evident and additional analysis identified the mutated peptide ILEATNR, concordant with a p.Pro73Leu mutation, also known as the “Basel” mutation 14 . This proteoform has a heparin‐binding site (HBS) defect reducing the AT activity and studies indicate high percentages of obstetric complications (34.7%–37.5%) in women with this mutation, matching the miscarriages of the patients 10,11 . The difficulty in diagnosing this mutation has been reported, for example by Orlando et al, 15 who tested AT activity tests from four manufacturers on samples from seven patients with a known p.Pro73Leu mutation.…”
Section: Molecular Characterization Of At Using Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A heterozygous mutation within this peptide was thus evident and additional analysis identified the mutated peptide ILEATNR, concordant with a p.Pro73Leu mutation, also known as the “Basel” mutation 14 . This proteoform has a heparin‐binding site (HBS) defect reducing the AT activity and studies indicate high percentages of obstetric complications (34.7%–37.5%) in women with this mutation, matching the miscarriages of the patients 10,11 . The difficulty in diagnosing this mutation has been reported, for example by Orlando et al, 15 who tested AT activity tests from four manufacturers on samples from seven patients with a known p.Pro73Leu mutation.…”
Section: Molecular Characterization Of At Using Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Current larger studies, upon which guidelines are based, often group all types of AT deficiency to generate sufficient power for statistical analysis, leading to underestimation of RPL risk of specific molecular AT forms. Smaller studies and case reports describing specific well‐characterized AT deficiencies do show a link with obstetric complications 10,11 . We here present a case report that illustrates the need for molecularly defined AT deficiency screening at the protein level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Type II deficiencies have normal or near-normal antigen levels but reduced activity ( Kuhle et al , 2001 ; Smith et al , 2021 )]. Interestingly, some groups started using computational techniques to study the effects of mutations in the AT protein using a variety of techniques, including molecular dynamics ( Gindele et al , 2021 ), the prediction of mutation effects ( Luxembourg et al , 2011 , 2015 ; Mulder et al , 2017 ) and explored possible heparin substitutes with higher AT affinities ( Navarro-Fernández et al , 2012 ). Although these studies represent an important step toward the digitalization and potential simulation of the AT protein features in silico , their agreement with in vitro and clinical data was not satisfactory; their findings were often restricted to a few representative variants of the AT protein, could not be generalized to other known mutations and neither be used to predict the effect of novel mutations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%