1964
DOI: 10.21236/ad0466662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the Effect of Surface Condition on the Radiant Properties of Metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistency between the data points of Silvera, Aksyutov and the model supports the notion of temperature-independent optical constants of platinum. Slight variation is found in Rolling's [39] work at shorter wavelengths, however, rougher samples in the work of Rolling tended to have greater values at lower wavelengths. Relative spectral directional emissivity coefficients are evaluated and compared to the experimental work of Rolling.…”
Section: Case 1: Flat Platinum Surfacementioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistency between the data points of Silvera, Aksyutov and the model supports the notion of temperature-independent optical constants of platinum. Slight variation is found in Rolling's [39] work at shorter wavelengths, however, rougher samples in the work of Rolling tended to have greater values at lower wavelengths. Relative spectral directional emissivity coefficients are evaluated and compared to the experimental work of Rolling.…”
Section: Case 1: Flat Platinum Surfacementioning
confidence: 88%
“…The relative spectral directional emissivity coefficients are once again evaluated and compared to the experimental work of Rolling [39]. Figure 6 shows the evaluation of the parallel polarized component of light across angle for several wavelengths while Figure 7 shows the same for the perpendicular polarized component of light.…”
Section: Case 2: Flat 304 Ss Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of the normal spectral emittance of tungsten with a surface roughness of 10-28 m rms at temperatures between 500 and 1380 K yield values ranging from 0.52 to 0.67 at 1200 nm and from 0.45 to 0.6 at 1500 nm. 13 For surfaces with 4 -5 m rms roughness the values drop to as low as 0.45 and 0.38 at 1200 and 1500 nm. 13 Normal emittance values of 0.57 at 1200 nm and 0.47 at 1500 nm were measured on impregnated porous tungsten dispenser cathodes at room temperature by Simmons et al 14 At a temperature of 1111°C, they estimated emittances of 0.51 and 0.48 at 1000 and 1800 nm based on a balance between input and radiated power for a very large dispenser cathode.…”
Section: B Apparent Emittance Correctionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…13 For surfaces with 4 -5 m rms roughness the values drop to as low as 0.45 and 0.38 at 1200 and 1500 nm. 13 Normal emittance values of 0.57 at 1200 nm and 0.47 at 1500 nm were measured on impregnated porous tungsten dispenser cathodes at room temperature by Simmons et al 14 At a temperature of 1111°C, they estimated emittances of 0.51 and 0.48 at 1000 and 1800 nm based on a balance between input and radiated power for a very large dispenser cathode. In a very careful study, Jaafari and Free measured the emittance at 660 nm of a dispenser cathode operated at 1210°C for over 4000 h with two cold starts and one brief exposure to atmosphere.…”
Section: B Apparent Emittance Correctionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The spectral emissivity e(l,T) is taken from Touloukian [14], which contains multiple datasets. We have chosen the dataset from Rolling et al [17] as this is the dataset with conditions best applicable to our situation. The factor π comes from the integration over the solid angle, assuming the radiation from the strip has a Lambertian profile, and I(l,T) is the black body radiation curve according to Planck's law (2).…”
Section: Spectral Radiant Flux Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%