Investigation of the Effect of Differential Morphing on Forward Flight by Using PID Algorithm in Quadrotors

Köse, Oğuz; Oktay, Tugrul

doi:10.30518/jav.685256

Cited by 17 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The quadrotors, as rotary wing aerial vehicles, are particularly prominent platforms in experimental studies because of their maneuverability, simple designs, vertical take-off/landing capability, as well as their ability to hover in the air (Henriques, 2011;Michini et al, 2011;Azfar and Hazry, 2011;Kose and Oktay, 2020a). In addition, they can easily be used indoors and outdoors.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

PSO and GA tuned conventional and fractional order PID controllers for quadrotor control

Sarıbaş

Kahvecioglu

2021

AEAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to compare the performance of the conventional and fractional order proportional-integral-derivative (PID and FOPID) controllers tuned with a particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA) for quadrotor control. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the gains of the controllers were tuned using PSO and GA, which are included in the heuristic optimization methods. The tuning processes of the controller’s gains were formulated as optimization problems. While generating the objective functions (cost functions), four different decision criteria were considered separately: integrated summation error (ISE), integrated absolute error, integrated time absolute error and integrated time summation error (ITSE). Findings According to the simulation results and comparison tables that were created, FOPID controllers tuned with PSO performed better performances than PID controllers. In addition, the ITSE criterion returned better results in control of all axes except for altitude control when compared to the other cost functions. In the control of altitude with the PID controller, the ISE criterion showed better performance. Originality/value While a conventional PID controller has three parameters (Kp, Ki, Kd) that need to be tuned, FOPID controllers have two additional parameters (µ). The inclusion of these two extra parameters means more flexibility in the controller design but much more complexity for parameter tuning. This study reveals the potential and effectiveness of PSO and GA in tuning the controller despite the increased number of parameters and complexity.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

PSO and GA tuned conventional and fractional order PID controllers for quadrotor control

Sarıbaş

Kahvecioglu

2021

AEAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since the vehicle cannot go below the Earth's surface, the integrator used to convert z-speed into z-position must have a zero lower limit. Filtering out the negative signals that would force the motor to turn in the other direction is what saturators are for [35,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. While some multirotor vehicles are capable of performing flips and even flying upside down, this is not the primary focus of our research.…”

Section: Altitude Control Of Advanced Hbwb Uavmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design, Computational Aerodynamic, Aerostructural, and Control Stability Investigations of VTOL-Configured Hybrid Blended Wing Body-Based Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Intruder Inspections

Raja¹,

Murugesan

Solaiappan³

et al. 2023

International Journal of Aerospace Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are gaining in popularity and sophistication in today’s modern world. UAVs are now available in a wide range of configurations. A UAV’s many applications include aerial photography and videography and target tracking. The upward-pointing propellers of some modern fixed-wing UAVs make it possible for them to take off and land vertically. Surveillance and intruder inspections are two areas where the blended wing body (BWB) configuration shines. This is because its weight is spread uniformly throughout the body, its radar signal is weaker than that of alternative configurations, and there is a relatively small amount of interference with its movement. With common design factors in mind, like vertical takeoff and landing, aerodynamic drag, and fundamental wing stability, the optimal BWB plan form for surveillance is designed. CATIA is used to finish the conceptual design of the BWB-based UAV. A fluid-structure interaction (FSI) study is carried out after the model has been examined in ANSYS Fluent. The UAV’s responsiveness is improved through simulation in the MATLAB environment after a proportional-integral-derivative-type altitude controller was developed. The results demonstrate that providing the UAV with an altitude instruction enhances its performance. Given the flexibility of the suggested BWB UAV’s design, we have decided to limit its maximum forward speed to 75 m/s and its maximum rate of vertical ascension to 50 m/s. Rapid BWB UAVs like the one seen here are quite helpful in dangerous situations.

show abstract

Fast terminal synergetic control for morphing quadcopter with time-varying parameters

Belmouhoub,

Bouzid,

Medjmadj

et al. 2023

Aerospace Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Investigation of the Effect of Differential Morphing on Forward Flight by Using PID Algorithm in Quadrotors

Cited by 17 publications

References 11 publications

PSO and GA tuned conventional and fractional order PID controllers for quadrotor control

PSO and GA tuned conventional and fractional order PID controllers for quadrotor control

Design, Computational Aerodynamic, Aerostructural, and Control Stability Investigations of VTOL-Configured Hybrid Blended Wing Body-Based Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Intruder Inspections

Fast terminal synergetic control for morphing quadcopter with time-varying parameters

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About