2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4816715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the effect of low energy ion beam irradiation on mono-layer graphene

Abstract: In this paper, the effect of low energy irradiation on mono-layer graphene was studied. Mono-layer graphene films were irradiated with B, N and F ions at different energy and fluence. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy indicates that foreign ions implanted at ion energies below 35 eV could dope into the graphene lattice and form new chemical bonds with carbon atoms. The results of Raman measurement indicate that ion beam irradiation causes defects and disorder to the graphene crystal structure, and the level of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[23][24][25][26] To add to the complexity of the situation, the synthesis conditions of doped graphene, which most commonly follow the chemical route, yield graphene samples of varying quality, 17 often with several types of dopant atom and defect configurations within the same specimen. [25][26][27] In a bid to produce uniformly6doped single6 layer graphene specimens, the successful implementation of low6energy ion implantation with either N or B was recently demonstrated, [28][29][30] achieving retention levels of the order of ~1% in good agreement with theoretical predictions. 31 This ion6implantation technique, commonly used by the modern semiconductor industry for doping Si wafers, for instance, has the advantage of allowing the uniform incorporation over a large area of single dopants on a pre6screened, single6layer, suspended graphene sample, and of producing comparatively few defects or ad6atom configurations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…[23][24][25][26] To add to the complexity of the situation, the synthesis conditions of doped graphene, which most commonly follow the chemical route, yield graphene samples of varying quality, 17 often with several types of dopant atom and defect configurations within the same specimen. [25][26][27] In a bid to produce uniformly6doped single6 layer graphene specimens, the successful implementation of low6energy ion implantation with either N or B was recently demonstrated, [28][29][30] achieving retention levels of the order of ~1% in good agreement with theoretical predictions. 31 This ion6implantation technique, commonly used by the modern semiconductor industry for doping Si wafers, for instance, has the advantage of allowing the uniform incorporation over a large area of single dopants on a pre6screened, single6layer, suspended graphene sample, and of producing comparatively few defects or ad6atom configurations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Experimentally, various methods have been reported to reduce R C : one of the most common approaches is postmetallization annealing . Other methods aim to modify the graphene prior to metallization in a random manner, such as low power oxygen plasma etch (with or without postmetallization annealing), ozone pretreatment, intentional doping of graphene below the contact metal, and ion beam irradiation . A more deterministic approach is the formation of “edge” contacts, where the graphene under the contact is partially removed by lithographic methods to enable the formation of covalent bonds between graphene and metal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, three categories of methods have been widely used to modulate the carrier type of semiconductors, some of which were already applied for the n‐doping of BP: (i) substitutional doping, including substitutional doping during growth, ion implantation, plasma treating, etc; (ii) charge transfer from an electron donor or acceptor, involving gas molecules, metal particles, organics, and oxides; (iii) field‐induced doping, which could successfully inverse the p‐type silicon to n‐type . For 2D materials, due to their stable lattice structures and absence of dangling bonds, substitutional doping has been only achieved in very few 2D semiconductor materials, such as N, B, F substitutional doping to graphene, selenium dope of black phosphorus, etc . While, the performance of the semiconductor especially its transport property employing this approach will be degraded seriously because of inevitable defects and charged impurity scattering centers .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%