2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the effects of offshore breakwater parameters on sediment accumulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between 1988 and 1996, the accretion continued, especially from the fourth breakwater where the salient observed in 1988 was transformed into a tombolo, while those already created have proliferated. The application of the empirical formulas of Seiji et al (1987) and Birben et al (2007) in the study area shows that the tombolos' areas are related to the detached breakwaters' characteristics (length, distance to the coast, spacing).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Between 1988 and 1996, the accretion continued, especially from the fourth breakwater where the salient observed in 1988 was transformed into a tombolo, while those already created have proliferated. The application of the empirical formulas of Seiji et al (1987) and Birben et al (2007) in the study area shows that the tombolos' areas are related to the detached breakwaters' characteristics (length, distance to the coast, spacing).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large tombolos (Group 1) are developed behind longdetached breakwaters, installed near to the coastline and closely spaced from each other; whereas, small tombolos or Birben et al (2007) Condition of tombolos formation in the case of successive breakwaters: X B =ððL Bn þ L Bnþ1 Þ þ E B Þ between 0.2 and 0.4 X B =ððL Bn þ L Bnþ1 Þ þ E B Þ0:8; n is the breakwaters numbers (n≥1) salients (Group 2) are developed behind short breakwaters, installed far from the coastline and are more spaced from each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, incident waves impose force on the mangrove degradation areas from a Southwest direction at approximately 230 • to 250 • (magnetic) to the Northeast direction, with the significant wave heights between 0.10 and 0.21 m. In addition, the simulation results also show that the current velocity and wave heights were reduced in the nearshore area, before reaching the study site, due to the resistance forces of the cohesive sediment. Previous studies have reported that cohesive bed slopes have higher friction coefficients compared to sandy beach slopes [30,31]. Therefore, current and wave turbulent energies are reduced on cohesive coastal bed slopes.…”
Section: Sediment and Water Samples Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sloping bottom of the nearshore acts like a natural defence and protects the shore against waves, currents and storms [30,31] by dissipating the wave energy through wave breaking phenomena and depending on bottom friction coefficient [32]. The breaking wave may re-form and break again several times before finally rushing up the foreshore areas in the swash zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%