2020
DOI: 10.25092/baunfbed.680822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the effects of different tool geometries on welded joining of EN AW-5754 and EN AW-5083 aluminum alloys with friction stir welding

Abstract: Sürtünme karıştırma kaynağı 1990'lı yılların başlarında ilk kez keşfedilmiştir. O yıllardan günümüze değin endüstride pek çok alanda kullanılmıştır. Sürtünme karıştırma kaynağı, aynı veya farklı özellikteki malzemelerin, ergitme sıcaklığının altındaki sıcaklıklarda birleştirilmesinde kullanılan, bir katı hal kaynak yöntemidir. Kaynak işlemi sırasında kullanılan takımlar kaynaklı birleştirmenin metalurjik ve mekanik özelliklerini büyük oranda etkilemektedir. Takımların karıştırıcı uç geometrilerinin kaynaklı bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the tensile tests carried out on specimens of AA5754 and AA5083 alloys, the rupture was always seen to occur in the HAZ and ductile fracture on the side of the AA5754 specimen. The cracks developed on the side of the AA5754 specimen owing to its slow tensile strength compared to that of AA5083; this is consistent with the literature [23,26,35,36].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the tensile tests carried out on specimens of AA5754 and AA5083 alloys, the rupture was always seen to occur in the HAZ and ductile fracture on the side of the AA5754 specimen. The cracks developed on the side of the AA5754 specimen owing to its slow tensile strength compared to that of AA5083; this is consistent with the literature [23,26,35,36].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Figure 2 indicates that the welding seams of specimen 2, 3, 4, 5 were smooth and uniform, while those of specimen 1, 6, 7, 8 were rough. Therefore, the rough structure noticed in the welding seam of specimens 1, 6, 7, and 8 was thought to negatively affect the mechanical values of the weld [11,35]. According to the tensile test results, microstructure analyses and microhardness tests were performed for specimen 4, for which the highest welding strength was detected, and specimen 8, for which the lowest welding strength was determined.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation