2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0026-2692(01)00122-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the effects of byproduct components in Cu plating for advanced interconnect metallization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common technique is cyclic voltammetry stripping (CVS). 30,31,35,37 This technique has been widely used because it is very simple and sensitive, and it does not require a long time to analyze. A drawback of this technique is the inability to distinguish the concentrations of by-products from those of additives, and these by-products could influence the performance of the plating solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common technique is cyclic voltammetry stripping (CVS). 30,31,35,37 This technique has been widely used because it is very simple and sensitive, and it does not require a long time to analyze. A drawback of this technique is the inability to distinguish the concentrations of by-products from those of additives, and these by-products could influence the performance of the plating solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These decrease the filling capability of the plating solution even though the concentration of each additive is normal. 12 An accelerator-free electrolyte has been demonstrated to be feasible to cause superfill on submicrometer via metallization to reduce the additive of the plating formula, the analytic complexity of the additives and the aging effect of the plating solution. 13,14 In this technique, the test specimen was pre-dipped into an accelerator-containing solution ͑i.e., SPS or DPS͒ to form an adlayer of the accelerator on the copper seed layer before the test specimen was transferred into an accelerator-free plating solution in which the suppressor ͑i.e., PEG + Cl − ͒ was the only additive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, additive breakdown also occurs mainly due to electrodic reactions and oxidation by dissolved air in the bath. Both of these processes are theorized to cause an adverse effect on the coating film quality.Considerable efforts have been made in recent decades to achieve the monitor and the control of an electroplating ͑EP͒ bath: the use of hull cell and cyclic voltammetric stripping ͑CVS͒, 6,10-14 cathodic depolarization measurements, 15 "in-process" mass spectrometry ͑IPMS͒, 16,17 linear voltammetric stripping ͑LVS͒, 13,18 cyclic pulsed voltammetric stripping ͑CPVS͒, 12,19 and HPLC 4,5,7,20,21 techniques has been reported for this purpose.HPLC is probably the most direct technique for measurement of additives concentrations and for by-product monitoring. The sample typically requires some pretreatment prior to analysis on the HPLC in order to separate Cu 2+ ion peaks that may interfere with the peaks generated by the organic additives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%