2021
DOI: 10.1177/03093247211021240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the explosive type on the high strain forming of OFHC copper tube

Abstract: The paper computationally investigates the explosive forming of the oxygen-free high thermal conductivity (OFHC) copper tube subjected to five different explosives. To investigate the effect of explosive type on the formability of OFHC copper tube, commonly used explosives, including C-4, TNT, HMX, Comp-B, and PBXN, was compared by using the finite element method. To verify the developed finite element model (FEM), the explosive forming experiments were carried out by using C-4. In the simulations, Coupled-Eul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5 compares the experimentally obtained porosity measurements with the FEM. The following formula was employed to calculate average porosity levels for the 95% confidence level [60]…”
Section: Verification Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 5 compares the experimentally obtained porosity measurements with the FEM. The following formula was employed to calculate average porosity levels for the 95% confidence level [60]…”
Section: Verification Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5 compares the experimentally obtained porosity measurements with the FEM. The following formula was employed to calculate average porosity levels for the 95% confidence level [ 60 ] f = f ¯ z * s m In Equation (9), f is the range of measured porosity for the 95% confidence interval, f ¯ is the average value of porosity, z * is the confidence level (1.96 for 95%), s is the calculated standard deviation of the porosity measurements, and m is the number of samples.…”
Section: Verification Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To forecast the protection of steel supported concrete structures to predict dynamic and sudden loads, several methodologies, including experimental, analytical, and computational, have been established. The numerical approach combined with some experimental verification is the most encouraging of these since it offers extensive and thorough information that can be utilized to verify and enhance engineering solutions [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%