2017
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the Formation Process of PNIPAM-Based Ionic Microgels

Abstract: The formation process of poly( N -isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM)-based ionic microgels was investigated in this work. Different from the traditional formation process of covalent bond cross-linked PNIPAM-based microgels, a disassembling and reassembling process for PNIPAM-based ionic microgels was observed. During the formation process, loose microgels were first formed in a short time, and then, these loose microgels disassembled into smaller nanogel pieces. Meanwhile, the nanogel pieces… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PNIPAm microgels are synthesized by free-surfactant radical polymerization as detailed in [ 32 ]. We employed two ionic initiators, potassium peroxodisulfate (KPS) and 2,2’-Azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AIBA), because of their proven efficacy in initiating FRP [ 1 , 47 ] and hence in determining the electrophoretic behavior of the final microgels. The two initiators have generally two different initial reaction rates, as reported for other microgel systems [ 48 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PNIPAm microgels are synthesized by free-surfactant radical polymerization as detailed in [ 32 ]. We employed two ionic initiators, potassium peroxodisulfate (KPS) and 2,2’-Azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AIBA), because of their proven efficacy in initiating FRP [ 1 , 47 ] and hence in determining the electrophoretic behavior of the final microgels. The two initiators have generally two different initial reaction rates, as reported for other microgel systems [ 48 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding energy of the carbon spectrum for C1s was determined t be 284.7 eV, 286.5 eV, and 287.4 eV for C-C, C-H, and C-N binding, respectively (Figure 4a [18]. The binding energy modes of nitrogen (N1s) were 398.1 eV and 399.4 eV for the C-N an N-H bonds of NIPAm and Am monomer segments, respectively (Figure 4b) [19]. Furthe more, the oxygen element (O1s) peak location for C=O groups of NIPAm units include in the p(NIPAM-co-Am) NG copolymer segments was 532.3 eV (Figure 4c) [20].…”
Section: Instrumental Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 98%