1999
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the Glow Peak Parameters, Reusability and Dosimetric Precision of LiF:Mg,Cu,P at High Heating Rates up to 20Ks-1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After a preheat session at 135°C for10 s, the TL signal was acquired from 135°C to 240°C at a heating rate of 10°C/s. LiF (MCP) is usually annealed in an oven for 10 min at 240°C,[1618] but deformed glow curves were noticed by following this procedure [Figure 1], which might be due to imperfect thermal transmission form metal plate container in the oven. For this reason, single chip annealing method using reader post-reading cycle (240°C for 10 s), was preferred.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a preheat session at 135°C for10 s, the TL signal was acquired from 135°C to 240°C at a heating rate of 10°C/s. LiF (MCP) is usually annealed in an oven for 10 min at 240°C,[1618] but deformed glow curves were noticed by following this procedure [Figure 1], which might be due to imperfect thermal transmission form metal plate container in the oven. For this reason, single chip annealing method using reader post-reading cycle (240°C for 10 s), was preferred.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, high dose measurements were performed on fresh samples and each detector was used only once, because the detectors lose their sensitivity to a large extent as a result of these measurements. The main reason is the well-known feature of LiF:Mg,Cu,P detectors: sensitivity loss when heated beyond about 270°C (Oster et al 1993, 1996, Bilski et al,1997, Ben-Amar et al, 1999. It was also reported by Meijvogel and Bos (1995) that high temperature readout is causing both reversible and irreversible changes of the sensitivity of the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A parameter called the Ultra-High Temperature Ratio (UHTR) was defined in order to quantify the observed changes of the MCP glow-curve shape at very high doses and very high temperatures, which allows measuring the absorbed dose in the range from 1 kGy to 1 MGy (Bilski et al, 2010;Obryk et al, 2010a). This dosimetric method was tested in a range of radiation qualities, such as gamma radiation, electron and proton beams, thermal neutron fields and high-energy mixed fields around the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) and the Proton Synchrotron (PS) accelerators at CERN (the European Organization for Nuclear Research) (Obryk et al, 2008(Obryk et al, , 2011b (Oster et al 1993, 1996, Bilski et al,1997, Ben-Amar et al, 1999. It was also reported by Meijvogel and Bos (1995) that high temperature readout is causing both reversible and irreversible changes of the sensitivity of the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past few years, considerable efforts have been made to produce new thin detector materials for personal extremity dosimetry (1) . The understanding of how different physical parameters influence the characteristics of such materials has also been improved (2)(3)(4)(5) . The main challenge has been to develop a TLD capable of measuring the personal dose equivalent at a depth of about 7 mg.cm −2 , without losing too much in sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%