Investigation of the influence of particle size on the quantitative analysis of glasses by energy‐dispersive micro x‐ray fluorescence spectrometry

Abstract

Micro x‐ray fluorescence analyses were undertaken on individual glass particles of different compositions for selected particle sizes between 50 µm and ≥1 mm. These experiments revealed a complex behaviour in the fluorescence spectra; this behaviour is influenced by the glass matrix, topology, particle volume, energy range and polycapillary properties and cannot be corrected by simple approaches. Net fluorescence intensities and reproducibility measured with two different polycapillaries (40 and 60 µm) were evaluated for six element lines between 1 and 10 keV and compared with the same standard glasses provided as ideal specimens (i.e. with flat, polished surface and of ‘infinite’ thickness). A standardless quantification using the fundamental parameter model gave a reasonable accuracy for particle sizes ≥1 mm (ca 15% relative standard deviations for the main elements) without further sample preparation. The feasibility of principal components analysis for a fast identification of compositional types using the measurement data of individual particles was demonstrated. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Quantitative X-ray fluorescence analysis of samples of less than ‘infinite thickness’: Difficulties and possibilities

“…The proposed procedure was validated with irregularly shaped, homogeneous glass particles of sizes from 50 to 150 µm. The influence of size of individual glass particles (size from 50 to 1000 µm) on the results of quantitative analysis was discussed in [73]. FP method gave satisfactory results (ca.…”

Signal‐to‐noise ratios in forensic glass analysis by micro X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry

“…Accurate quantitation typically requires matrix‐matched standards and use of a method such as embedding and polishing of the sample to present a flat surface to the X‐ray beam . Sufficient standards are not commercially available for glass, embedding the fragments hinders the ability to conduct additional tests on the fragments, and variable thicknesses of thin fragments affect accuracy.…”

Preparation and magnetic properties of TbFeCo on the porous alumina templates

“…Varying estimates of the major elements is better than ±5% relative, in the best case, the analysis is capable of a 2% relative error. The error in the quantitative analysis by EDAX is summarized in Table 1 as indicated by the microprobe system manufacturer [21,22].…”