1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1992.tb14358.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the Interaction Mode of Phenothiazine Neuroleptics with α1-Acid Glycoprotein

Abstract: The interaction of phenothiazine neuroleptics with alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) and desialylated AGP (asialoAGP) has been investigated by fluorescence, circular dichroism spectroscopy and by equilibrium dialysis. The binding parameters of phenothiazines obtained from fluorescence agreed closely with those obtained from circular dichroism and equilibrium dialysis. The binding affinities (nK) to AGP were slightly higher than binding affinities to asialoAGP. Attempts to correlate binding affinities with partit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since amino electron density correlates with pK a values of the drugs, they postulated that a negatively charged region on the protein was stabilizing the binding of basic drugs by interacting with their protonated amino termini. Their model was likewise consistent with previous observations that the pK a values of phenothiazines correlated with their apparent affinities for unfractionated AGP (Miyoshi et al, 1992). However, for the LAs reported here, there was no correlation between pK a and affinity (Fig.…”
Section: Downloaded Fromsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since amino electron density correlates with pK a values of the drugs, they postulated that a negatively charged region on the protein was stabilizing the binding of basic drugs by interacting with their protonated amino termini. Their model was likewise consistent with previous observations that the pK a values of phenothiazines correlated with their apparent affinities for unfractionated AGP (Miyoshi et al, 1992). However, for the LAs reported here, there was no correlation between pK a and affinity (Fig.…”
Section: Downloaded Fromsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For the two series of local anesthetics, the linear alkyl amino homologs of lidocaine and the piperidine ring-containing homologs of mepivacaine, we found a linear relationship (r 2 ϭ 0.82) between ⌬G (dissociation) for AGP binding and the octanol:buffer partition coefficient of the neutral drug species. The strong correlation between hydrophobicity and the affinity for the LAs is in accord with studies showing that generalized hydrophobicity is a major determinant of binding for other drug classes, including basic drugs such as antihistamines and antihypertensives (Kaliszan et al, 1996), diazepines (Maruyama et al, 1992), and phenothiazines (Miyoshi et al, 1992), as well as acidic drugs such as coumarin anticoagulants (Maruyama et al, 1990). That the same linear correlation holds for both homologous series, each with a different conformation of carbons around the amino nitrogen, implies that this hydrophobic interaction is relatively forgiving, suggesting that the binding site is a broad hydrophobic surface or a flexible pocket that can accommodate ligands with a range of sizes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…1,[4][5][6][7][8] Two common methods that have been used in evaluating the binding of drugs to albumin include equilibrium dialysis and ultrafiltration. 9,10) These methods are laborious and time consuming and the results at times are not reproducible. However, these conventional methods are often inapplicable to the analyses of strongly bound drugs because of technical problems such as drug adsorption on the membrane and the leakage of bound drug through membrane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two common methods that have been used in evaluating the binding of drugs to albumin include equilibrium dialysis and ultrafiltration. 7) These methods are laborious and time consuming and the results, at times, are not reproducible. More over, these conventional methods are often inapplicable to the analyses of strongly bound drugs because of technical problems such as drug adsorption on the membrane and the leakage of bound drug through membrane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%