2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2015.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the interface between polyethylene and functionalized graphene: A computer simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(70 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The neat graphene and surface‐modified graphene with 4.06 NH 2 functional groups per nm 2 were used as the single sheet substrate. Among different functional groups (NH 2 , COOH, OH, and CH 3 ) with different surface densities which were applied to functionalize the graphene surface in our previous work, it was found that NH 2 group with the surface density of 4.06 groups nm −2 resulted in the highest thermodynamic WA between PE chains and the functionalized G . Therefore, the aforementioned functional group density was selected to investigate the effect of G surface functionalization on the PE/G interfacial adhesion strength in a tensile deformation process.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neat graphene and surface‐modified graphene with 4.06 NH 2 functional groups per nm 2 were used as the single sheet substrate. Among different functional groups (NH 2 , COOH, OH, and CH 3 ) with different surface densities which were applied to functionalize the graphene surface in our previous work, it was found that NH 2 group with the surface density of 4.06 groups nm −2 resulted in the highest thermodynamic WA between PE chains and the functionalized G . Therefore, the aforementioned functional group density was selected to investigate the effect of G surface functionalization on the PE/G interfacial adhesion strength in a tensile deformation process.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the nanocomposites, relatively weak vdW interactions act as the interface between nanofiller and polymer matrix. 91,92,[104][105][106][107]185,186,188 To improve the interfacial strength, researchers are trying to chemically functionalize and dope the nanofillers with various chemical groups. Certain authors have concluded in their work that the atomic vacancies and oxidized sp 3 carbon atoms in a GS helps in improving the interfacial properties, but sometime these functionalization is proved detrimental for the mechanical strength of nanofillers.…”
Section: Mechanical and Fracture Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same research group chemically functionalized the graphene with NH 2 , COOH, CH 3 , and OH groups to study their interaction with PE. 188 The Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm in conjunction with MD was employed by them to determine the thermodynamic WA between constituents. It was inferred from their results that vdW forces and electronegativity of functional groups played a crucial role in determining the WA, as it was found to be directly proportional to the functional group surface density (except for the CH 3 group).…”
Section: Mechanical and Fracture Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Having the outstanding mechanical properties, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene sheets are considered as great candidates to be used as the reinforcement phase in the nanocomposites. Hence, the physical properties of the nanocomposites have extensively been investigated to make clear their efficiency in improving the properties of the pure materials . Investigating the mechanical properties of the graphene reinforced epoxy, Rafiee et al showed that Young's modulus, tensile strength and mode I fracture toughness of the graphene–epoxy matrix with only 0.1 ± 0.002% weight fraction of the graphene are respectively 31, 40, and 53% larger than the pure epoxy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%