2017
DOI: 10.1080/14680629.2017.1329866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the interface bonding between concrete slab and asphalt overlay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The work of Benchler [21] showed that, due to better dispersion of stress, the train-induced structural stress under the slab track is much lower than that in pavement structure caused by vehicle load. The test results showed that the tested shear strength between asphalt waterproofing layer and concrete (2.01 MPa) is comparable to the bond strength between structure layers in asphalt pavement [34,35]. Therefore, the bonding strength was considered to be sufficient to resist possible shear stress caused by train load.…”
Section: Test Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The work of Benchler [21] showed that, due to better dispersion of stress, the train-induced structural stress under the slab track is much lower than that in pavement structure caused by vehicle load. The test results showed that the tested shear strength between asphalt waterproofing layer and concrete (2.01 MPa) is comparable to the bond strength between structure layers in asphalt pavement [34,35]. Therefore, the bonding strength was considered to be sufficient to resist possible shear stress caused by train load.…”
Section: Test Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Test Apparatus. Considering the effects of normal stress on interface bonding between HMA overlay and PCC layer, an upgraded direct shear test apparatus was developed, and more details about the device can be found in the previous research [25]. e equipment is able to apply normal stress in a horizontal direction through a hydraulic actuator, and the magnitude of normal stress can be obtained by a built-in stress sensor, as shown in Figure 1(a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been widely accepted that the mixture type, PCC surface texture, tack coat material, application rate of tack coat, normal stress on the interface, and temperature are the main influence factors affecting the interface bonding strength between HMA overlay and PCC layer [23][24][25]. For instance, a study pointed out that the interfacial shear strength at 25°C is about five times that of high temperature at 55°C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different factors affecting the bond strength at the interface where tack coats are applied have been investigated by different researchers [3,18,20,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. The factors in most of these studies are tack coat type, surface type, mixture type, temperature, and residual tack rate.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study conducted by Al-Qadi et al [25], the optimum tack coat application rate was recommended depending on surface type, tack coat type, and cleanliness. Zhao et al [28] reported that tack coat application rate and mixture type are less important factors that influence the interlayer shear strength as compared to the surface texture on a cement concrete slab, the tack type, temperature, and humidity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%