1995
DOI: 10.1364/josab.12.000921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the internal field in photorefractive materials and measurement of the effective electro-optic coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Table 9.1). It is important to note that the reduction in the internal electric field obtained from measurements of rectification (E int = E 0 /(1 + q) = 0.59 E 0 for BGO and E int = 0.52 E 0 for BSO) is surprisingly close to the data reported in [25], where it was found that E int = 0.6 E 0 for BSO. This can mean that the factor q ≈ 0.7 is quite a typical value for BSO and BGO, and many data obtained from measurements in a permanent external field must be corrected by a factor 1/(1 + q) ≈ 0.6.…”
Section: Overall Rectificationsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(Table 9.1). It is important to note that the reduction in the internal electric field obtained from measurements of rectification (E int = E 0 /(1 + q) = 0.59 E 0 for BGO and E int = 0.52 E 0 for BSO) is surprisingly close to the data reported in [25], where it was found that E int = 0.6 E 0 for BSO. This can mean that the factor q ≈ 0.7 is quite a typical value for BSO and BGO, and many data obtained from measurements in a permanent external field must be corrected by a factor 1/(1 + q) ≈ 0.6.…”
Section: Overall Rectificationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…If holographic experiments are performed in the presence of an applied electric field, one more factor can be very important. As is often discussed, the internal field in sillenites is lower (for instance, by a factor of 0.6 [25]) than the expected internal field corresponding to the applied voltage. This is due to various screening effects caused, for instance, by the influence of contacts (or contact areas) or inhomogeneous illumination of the sample [26].…”
Section: Optical Properties and Photoactive Centersmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So, in theory, 0 Ϸ E D / E E Ϸ 0.027͑Ϸ1.5°͒ should produce a stationary hologram, which is in agreement with the experimental value considering that electrical charges associated with the photorefractive centers may accumulate near the electrodes and thereby act to screen the externally applied field E E , increasing the theoretical 0 value. 36 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%