2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the key parameters for gas sensing through comparison of electrospun and sol-gel semiconducting oxides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table , the preparative conditions are the same for all samples; nevertheless, outcomes are quite different. The SSAs of SnO 2 are between ∼44 and 50 m 2 /g; for all CD templates, these values are quite higher or at least comparable with those reported in the literature for SnO 2 prepared by other synthetic routes. This result is very interesting since the samples were obtained through an objectively very simple preparation, without complex procedures and, even more noteworthily, without any solvent in any step. On the other hand, ZnO samples show much lower SSAs with respect to SnO 2 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table , the preparative conditions are the same for all samples; nevertheless, outcomes are quite different. The SSAs of SnO 2 are between ∼44 and 50 m 2 /g; for all CD templates, these values are quite higher or at least comparable with those reported in the literature for SnO 2 prepared by other synthetic routes. This result is very interesting since the samples were obtained through an objectively very simple preparation, without complex procedures and, even more noteworthily, without any solvent in any step. On the other hand, ZnO samples show much lower SSAs with respect to SnO 2 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…On the other hand, ZnO samples show much lower SSAs with respect to SnO 2 . In this case, SSAs are lower or at least comparable to those reported in the literature for ZnO prepared by other synthetic routes. Nevertheless, this result still remains interesting, taking into account that the samples, as in the other case, were obtained without complex procedures and without any solvent in any step.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…2 FeO 3 [111] 1 ppm-200 • C 32.97% ***** Fe 2 O 3 [104] 1 ppm-350 • C 3 ** 0.25CuO-0.75Fe 2 O 3 [104] 1 ppm-350 • C 10.6 ** 0. 5CuO-0.5Fe 2 O 3 [104] 1 ppm-350 • C 15.3 ** 0.75CuO-0.25Fe 2 O 3 [104] 1 ppm-350 [102] 5 ppm-260 • C 0.44 * ZnO [115] 100 ppm-RT 11.78% NA GO/ZnO [115] 100 ppm-RT 31.17% NA Co 3 O 4 [116] 20 ppm-225 • C 0.04 * 0.2 GO-Co 3 O 4 [116] 20 ppm-225 • C 9.26 * Cu/G-doped ZnO [117] 50 ppm-270 • C 3.21 ** ZnO [118] 10 ppm-450 • C 25 * SnO 2 [118] 10 ppm-350 • C <20 * TiO 2 [118] 10 ppm-350 • C <30 * Fe-doped rGO decorated WO 3 [119] 10 ppm-130 • C 4.678 ** LaFeO 3 [120] 100 ppm-100 • C 132.1 * LaFeO 3 /La 2 O 3 [120] 100 ppm-100 • C 25.7 * LaFeO 3 /Fe 2 O 3 [120] 100 ppm-100 [118] 50 ppm-450 • C <7 * TiO 2 [118] 50 ppm-450 • C <4 * CuFe 2 O 4 [102] 5 ppm-260 • C 1.22 * SnO 2 [122] 470 ppm-450 [124] NA-30 • C 78.57% ***** Sb(1.8at%)-doped SnO 2 [124] NA-80 • C 18.74% ***** Sb(2.4at%)-doped SnO 2 [124] NA-80 • C 71% ***** Ni(10 mol.%)ZnO [125] 40 ppm-RT 33.3% ***** Ni(20 mol.%)ZnO [125] 40 ppm-RT 61.1% ***** Ni(30 mol.%)ZnO [125] 40 ppm-RT 16.6% ***** LaFeO 3 [126] 5000 ppm-220 • C 1.72% ***** LaCo 0 . 1 Fe 0 .…”
Section: • Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the organisation and positioning of nanostructures may provide difficulties (Krishna, 2022). Researchers have successfully utilised various methods, including the hydrothermal technique Catto, 2023), sol-gel chemistry (Sztaberek, 2019;, electrospinning (Fioravanti, 2022;Chen, 2022) and Vapor phase deposition (chemical, physical) (Galstyan, 2022), to grow MOXs nanowires for gas-sensing applications. These methods are preferred due to their simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and ability to produce consistent results.…”
Section: Growth Techniques Of One-dimensional Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%