2013
DOI: 10.1115/1.4023434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the Magnus Effect of a Generic Projectile at Mach 3 Up to 16 Degrees Angle of Attack

Abstract: The Magnus effect on a generic 6.37 diameter long tangential-ogive-cylinder type projectile was studied by means of 3D Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations and wind tunnel measurements. The nominal Mach number was 3 and the Reynolds number, based on the model length, was 1.09 x 10^. The simulations provided a profound insight into the flow structure and revealed a shift of the cross-flow separation lines as a consequence of the spin. This was shown to be the primary source of the Magnus side forc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the body Magnus force increases first and then decreases with angle of attack. Klatt et al (2014) proposed that the generation and distortion of the secondary vortices are responsible for this phenomenon. However, the angle of attack was limited in 16°, and the rapid decrease of the Magnus force at large angle of attack was not explained.…”
Section: Transient Lateral Force and Time-averagedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the body Magnus force increases first and then decreases with angle of attack. Klatt et al (2014) proposed that the generation and distortion of the secondary vortices are responsible for this phenomenon. However, the angle of attack was limited in 16°, and the rapid decrease of the Magnus force at large angle of attack was not explained.…”
Section: Transient Lateral Force and Time-averagedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicting the Magnus effect accurately and investigating its flow mechanism are what researches have been longing for. CONTACT Xiaosheng Wu wxs171@sina.com During the past few decades, the Magnus effect of nonfinned projectile has been studied by many researchers (Despirito & Plostins, 2007;Fletcher, 1972;Klatt, Hruschka, & Leopold, 2012, 2014Nietubicz & Opalka, 1980;Silton, 2005;Simon, Deck, Guillen, Merlen, & Cayzac, 2009). The previous work indicates that the boundary layer distortion is the main source of the Magnus effect at small angles of attack, and that the asymmetrical flow separation on the projectile surface directly influences the Magnus effect at large angles of attack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These may include the surface fineness, AoA, Mach number, Reynolds number, spin rate or projectile geometry. The work already done provides a detailed database of Magnus force calculation, whether it be the wind-tunnel-mounted projectiles testing (3,4) ; free-flight experiments, which were extensively conducted by U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory (5)(6)(7)(8)(9) ; empirical modeling (10,11) ; or the numerical analysis (1,2,(12)(13)(14) . How the Magnus force and moment varies with Mach number, AoA, AoS and spin rate from subsonic to supersonic speeds, cross-sectional variation in pressure distribution with respect to AoA, visualization of vortex core ripples due to interaction of opposite flows, resonant frequency oscillations and FFT-based spectral analysis of nutation and precession frequencies dependencies on Magnus force/moment, are yet to be elaborated and are the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, through the analysis of Chinese wrestling athletes (Pavez, 2016), we need to strengthen the coaches and athletes to the recognition of the importance of the secondary attack. A single technology of modern wrestling does not produce an ideal effect of scoring, and the application of the subsequent continuous action will have more advantages in the game (Klatt, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%